Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 4143

  • From: James M Horan
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 11708
    Date: 4/21/2010

    Comment Text:

    You can feel comfortable
    David Stawick, Secretary
    U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    Three Lafayette Centre
    1155 21
    st
    Street, NW
    Washington, D.C. 20581
    10-002
    COMMENT
    CL-02708
    Subject: Comments on Proposed Speculative Position Limits for Energy (File #10-002)
    Dear Mr. Stawick:
    I am writing today to endorse comments submitted by the Petroleum Marketers Association of America and the
    New England Fuel Institute submitted on April 9, 2010 on the proposed rule to implement speculative position
    limits for futm-es andoptions contracts for natural gas, crude oil, heating oil and gasoline. I am also m'iting to
    add my own thoughts on this matter to the public record.
    Futures markets were designed as a tool for
    bonafide
    commercial businesses and end-users to manage risk and
    "discover" prices for energy based on supply and demand economics. Businesses and consumers rely on these
    markets and are harmed when they become excessively volatile or subject to extreme price shocks, as we saw
    with the 2007-2008 energy bubble. In the past ten years, such events have become common and federal
    regulators failed to take assertive action to adch'ess the causes and to restore confidence in the energy futures
    markets.
    By strengthening and passing this proposed rulemaldng, the Commission has an opportunity to take an
    important step in this regard. It will be addressing the main cause of recent market instability -
    excessive
    speculation.
    Financial investors, including banks, hedge funds and index funds, speculate in the energy
    commodities markets for profit, rather than commodity-related businesses and users, who do so to protect
    themselves fi'om volatility and risk. Speculators take on the risk that hedgers seek to shed, however speculation
    should not dominate the markets. Moreover, one speculator or class of speculator should not be allowed to take
    a large, controlling position in any a single commodity.
    The Colmnission has a statutory obligation, if not a compelling moral obligation, to establish hard limits on the
    size of positions that speculators cau take in these markets, and to bar them from any exemptions. The rtde that
    has been proposed is not perfect, and again, I strongly m'ge the technical improvements suggested by the
    comments I have written to endorse.
    125 Simpson Street
    Stoughton, Massachusetts 02072-2399
    Heating & Air Conditioning
    Hot Water Sales & Service
    (781) 344-2233
    (800) 696-2266
    Fax (781) 344-8626You ~ fed comfor le with
    10-002
    COMMENT
    CL-02708
    In considering the ru!e, Commissioners must look past opposition by the financial community and remember
    the affect that excessive speculation has on businesses like mine, my consumers and the broader economy. It
    should establish restrictive speculative position limits, and implement them expeditiously, before we see a
    repeat of the 2007-2008 energy bubble and another major shock to a country still recovering from recession.
    Thank you for your consideration.
    Sincerely,
    James M. Horan
    125 Simpson Street
    Stoughton
    MA~ 02072
    125 Simpson Street
    Stoughton, Massachusetts 02072-2399
    Heating & Air Conditioning
    Hot Water Sales & Service
    (781) 344-2233
    (800) 696-2266
    Fax (781) 344-8626