Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 4143

  • From: Kinson Craft
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 11704
    Date: 4/19/2010

    Comment Text:

    David Stawick, Secretary
    U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    Three Lafayette Centre
    1155 21
    St
    Street, NW
    Washington, D.C. 20581
    i0-002
    COMMENT
    CL-02704
    Subjeet:
    Comments on Proposed Speculative Position Limits for Energy (File # 10-002)
    Dear Mr. Stawick:
    I am writing today to endorse comments submitted by the Petroleum Marketers Association of
    America and the New England Fuel Institute submitted on April 9, 2010 on the proposed rule to
    implement speculative position limits for futures and options contracts for natural gas, crude oil,
    heating oil and gasoline. I am also writing to add my own thoughts on this matter to the public
    record.
    Futures markets were designed as a tool for
    bonafide
    commercial businesses and end-users to
    manage risk and "discover" prices for energy based on supply and demand economics.
    Businesses and consumers rely on these markets and are harmed when they become excessively
    volatile or subject to extreme price shocks, as we saw with the 2007-2008 energy bubble. In the
    past ten years, such events have become common and federal regulators failed to take assertive
    action to address the causes and to restore confidence in the energy futures markets.
    By strengthening and passing this proposed rulemaking, the Commission has an opportunity to
    take an important step in this regard. It will be addressing the main cause of recent market
    instability -
    excessive speculation.
    Financial investors, including banks, hedge funds and index
    funds, speculate in the energy commodities markets for profit, rather than commodity-related
    businesses and users, who do so to protect themselves from volatility and risk. Speculators take
    on the risk that hedgers seek to shed, however speculation should not dominate the markets.
    Moreover, one speculator or class of speculator should not be allowed to take a large, controlling
    position in any a single commodity.
    The Commission has a statutory obligation, if not a compelling moral obligation, to establish hard
    limits on the size of positions that speculators can take in these markets, and to bar them from any
    exemptions. The rule that has been proposed is not perfect, and again, I strongly urge the
    technical improvements suggested by the comments I have written to endorse.
    In considering the rule; Commissioners must look past opposition by the financial community and
    remember the affect that excessive speculation ha~ on businesses like mine, my consumers and
    the broader economy. It should establish restrictive speculative position limits, and implement
    them expeditiously, before we see a repeat of the 2007-2008 energy bubble and another major
    shock to a country still recovering from recession.
    Thank you for your consideration.
    Sincerely,
    Kinson Craft-
    Owner / Partner
    99 N. Main Street, West Lebanon, NH 03784
    603-298-7200
    www.SimpleEnergyonline.com