Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 4143

  • From: Matt Cota
    Organization(s):
    Vermont Fuel Dealers Association

    Comment No: 11689
    Date: 4/21/2010

    Comment Text:

    Vermont Fuel Dealers Association
    www.vermontfuel.com
    David Stawick, Secretary
    U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    Three Lafayette Centre
    1155 21 st Street, NW
    Washington, D.C. 20581
    Fax: (202) 418-5521
    10-002
    COMMENT
    CL-02689
    0. F.L O.
    COMMENT
    Subjeet: Comments on Proposed Speculative Position Limits for Energy (File #10-002)
    Dear Mr. Stawick:
    I am writing today to endorse comments s~ubm!.tted by the P.¢.t:rg!..eum Marketers Association of
    America and the New England Fuel Institute ~ubrhitfed oii April 9~ 20.10' oh the proposed rule to
    implement speculative position limits for futures and options contracts for natural gas, crude oil,
    heating oil and gasoline. I am also m'iting to add my o~ thoughts on this matter to the public
    record.
    Futures markets we~'e designed as a tool for
    bonaJ?de
    commercial businesses and end-users to
    manage.risk and "discover" prices for .energY based on supply anddemand economics.
    Businesses and consumers rely on these markets and are harmed when they become excessively
    volatile or subject to extreme price shocks, as we saw with the 2007-2008 energy bubble. In the
    past ten years, such events have become common and federal regulators failed to take assertive
    action to address the causes and to restore confidence in the energy futures markets
    .: ....
    By strengthening and passing this proposed rulemal~ing, the Commission has an opportunity to
    take an important step in this regard. It will be ad&essing the main cause of.recent market
    instability -
    excessive spec~dation.
    Financial investors, including banks, hedge funds and index
    funds, speculate in the energy commodities markets for profit, l~ather.than 9o .rmn~ odity-related
    businesses and users, who do so to protec.t themselves from volatility and risk. Speculators take
    on the risk that hedgers seek to shed, however speculation should not dominate the markets.
    Moreover, one speculator or class of speculator should not be allowed to take a large, controlling
    position in any a single commodity.
    The Commission has a sta..tutory obligation, if not a compelling m0,~:al obligation, to ,establish
    hard limits on the size o.f positions that speculators can .take in these markets~ and to bar them
    fro~ any exemptions. The rule that has been. Pr0Po~ed
    ,is
    not perfect, and again~ I strongly urge
    the technical improvements suggested by the comments I have written to endorse.
    Vermont Fuel Dealers Association -- 250 Main St., Suite 301, Montpelier, VT 05602
    802-223-7750
    --
    [email protected]
    --
    www.vermontfuel.com10-002
    COMMENT
    CL-02689
    In consmerlng the rule, tSommlssloners must look past opposition by me ~lnanclal community
    and remember the affect that excessive speculation has on businesses like mine, my consumers
    and the broader economy. It should establish resta'ictive speculative position limits, and
    implement them expeditiously, before we see a repeat of the 2007-2008 energy bubble and
    another major shock to a count~3~ still recovering from recession.
    ThaN( you for your consideration.
    Sincerely,
    Matt Cota
    Executive Director
    Vermont Fuel Dealers Association
    Vermont Fuel Dealers Association -- 250 Main St., Suite 301, Montpelier, VT 05602
    802-223-7750 ~
    [email protected]
    --
    www.vermontfueLcom