Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Jeremy Reed
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 1124
    Date: 1/20/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-01124
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Jeremy Reed
    Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:54 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Regarding: RIN 3038-AC61
    Dear Secretary of CFTC,
    I have just received notice about the proposed further regulation of the retail forex market space.
    I
    have some comments:
    1. As I employ several automated trading programs (that I designed myself) in order to manage my personal
    investments, you have already substantially impaired my ability to earn relevant returns. By removing the ability to
    hold multiple opposing positions (simplified to hedging in your terms) I am unable to employ multiple independent
    trading methodologies on the same account (which would reduce my overall risk exposure). Instead, you decided
    to remove this ability to protect the stupid traders that hedge to protect losing positions. The pure stupidity of this
    rule simply amplifies the CFTC's lack of knowledge about this market space. Thanks for making this trading more
    risky and less productive!
    2. Now you want to diminish margin requirements. I currently only employ 1:1 and up to 10:1 leverage on some
    occasions, but the ability to have that cushion above that is very comforting. It means that my positions will not be
    subject to a wild swing and I wont be forced into a 'mark-to-market' margin liquidation call (MUCH LIKE THAT
    WHICH ALMOST DESTROYED THE MAJOR STOCK MARKETS IN 2008). Also, if the market moves 250 points
    in one day (not a frequent occurrence on the majors) and you have 100:1 leverage on a $1,000 balance that
    indeed would yield a loss of 2,500...except for the automated margin calls that are in place. The aforementioned
    hedging ability and the current topic of leverage provide the liquidity for these margin calls to be effected!
    STOP MAKING THE MARKET MORE RISKY AND LESS LUCRATIVE
    WE UNDERSTAND THE RISK WE TAKE WHEN TRADING IN THIS MARKET SPACE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    YOU ARE NOT NEEDED TO SCREW IT UP!!!!!!!!!! LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE THE GOVERNMENT OR GSEs
    HAVE DONE
    LET ME KEEP THE 15% PER MONTH RETURNS I'M ABLE TO EARN BECAUSE BETWEEN ALL THE TAXES I
    PAY AND THE LACK OF PERFORMANCE IN OTHER MARKETS (LARGELY DUE TO PUBLIC SECTOR
    INTERFERENCE IN THE PRIVATE MARKETS) I CANNOT BUILD ANY SAVING.
    CONTRARY TO MOST PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY, I DONT WANT TO BE A DEPENDENT OF THE
    GOVERNMENT AND IM DOING A DAMN GOOD JOB OF ENSURING THAT!!!
    GO AWAY!!
    -Jeremy