Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Stephen R Bergman
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 3539
    Date: 1/24/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-03539
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Stephen Bergman
    Sunday, January 24, 2010 2:15 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    ID #: RIN 3038-AC61
    Hello,
    As a new physician in the work force, I have the unfortunate situation of large student loans/credit
    balances due to the ever increasing cost of medical education coupled with increasing cuts to physicians
    reimbursements. When I first became acquainted with forex trading four years ago, it was the
    opportunity that reawakened the American dream for me. I knew there must be a way for the 'little guy'
    to get ahead in this day of the information superhighway, so long as one had access to the internet, a tiny
    bit of capitol, and the where-with-all to learn how to read and interact with the market. These days,
    there is a lar~ge difference between needing a few hundred dollars vs. ten thousand dollars to get started
    in the market. The risk that one takes trading this market is straight forward and reasonable considering
    that forex traders generally cannot create a negative balance. I have been continuously refining my
    trading strategy to minimize risk and optimize potential. Currently, I still find it hard to keep a balance
    near or above ten thousand dollars due to my numerous bills/expenses. I think that the proposed
    changes will make it increasingly more difficult for the average person to get a financial foothold should
    they be persistent enough to actually develop a strategy that works, and have the savings to use in the
    forex market. I'm not trying to conquer the world, but have chosen forex in this period of my life as a
    means of trying to build savings/capitol which will ultimately be cycled back into the US economy. It
    would really be a shame if this wonderful resource were basically shut off from so much of the
    population because of changing regulations, especially in the absence of a clear need to lessen the
    potential benefits of this market. PLEASE, consider letting the leverage remain at 100:1.
    Thank you,
    Stephen R Bergman, DO