Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Dan Giddens
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 3508
    Date: 1/24/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-03508
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Dan Giddens
    Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:55 AM
    secretary
    Comments Regarding the Proposed Change in Leverage Requirements
    Mr. Stawick,
    I rarely provide inputs to something like this, but feel very strongly about the proposed changes.
    I have been a currency trader for five years and have not had a profitable year yet. But what keeps me trying is
    the challenge of the profession and the potential rewards to a "little guy" like me. Changing the leverage
    requirements will place a very high demand upon me for deposits. I agree that reducing the leverage will have a
    net effect of eliminating a lot of people, maybe people that shouldn't be trading to begin with, but I'm not sure
    that's the role of the CFTC. I have read where 90% of the complaints resonate from small traders but that still
    doesn't ring true as the solution is to get rid of them.
    As I mentioned, I have traded for five years, unprofitably, but I have yet to have lost money that I couldn't afford
    to lose. I have never lost more that I can afford to pay. In other words, a margin call simply closed my account
    not created a burdensome debt. Another feature of currency trading that I like.
    Thanks for listening to my rambling thoughts. I would appreciate your consideration in not making these
    changes.
    Thanks, Dan Giddens