Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Alan Cantos
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 3321
    Date: 1/23/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-03321
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Alan Cantos
    Saturday, January 23, 2010 3:20 PM
    secretary
    'Regulation of Retail Forex'
    I don't understand why you want to bring the Forex leverage down to 10:1 ration. When you all decided that
    the brokers can't offer over 100:1, I was fine with that. You probably know that this will kill the forex market
    here in the US. With unemployment way over 10%, you would just be adding to it. Most of the retail forex
    brokers would go out of business. If you do this then I will have to go overseas to trade. I won't be able to
    trade here in the US anymore. I think100:1is fine. I trade stocks as well. Is the next step to take out the retail
    trader from the stock market also.
    People make money and lose money in the stock market just as they do in forex. This is an individual preference
    to trade. If you are trying to stop people from losing money in the forex market then you might as well ban us
    from retail stock trading as well.
    Again, I reiterate, I don't see why you need to change the leverage. As long as the brokers can cover the
    leverage I don't see the reason to change anything. What you need to do is make sure the forex brokers are
    honest brokers, that's where you need to put you energy.
    I vote no bringing the leverage down to 10:1