Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Ryan Transano
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 3287
    Date: 1/23/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-03287
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    ryan transano
    Saturday, January 23, 2010 2:10 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    This email is to simply state that reducing the maximum allowable leverage provided by Forex brokers
    is not going to protect consumers, but impair the Forex market of the group of retail traders that are
    doing just fine. Example, lowering leverage is not going to convert people to sit down and research on
    how to trade to trade for profits. What the reduction in leverage will most likely do, is let individuals
    lose their account a bit slower, and paying MORE commission fees to the brokers which hurts them two
    fold.
    There are other methods to get the "consumer protection" method across without impairing the rest and
    "shaping" the regulations to help the brokers gain more commissions. That is to help individuals that are
    wanting to open live accounts to default them to a demo trial account. Or some type of personal
    lettering to the brokers for individuals that truly know what they are getting themselves into. Basically,
    place more barriers of effort that individuals would have to go through which would help indicate that
    they know what they are getting themselves into. Simply cutting leverage is not going to bring positive
    change, but disrupt.
    --K