Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Paul Terwilliger
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 2926
    Date: 1/22/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COIMMENT
    CL-02926
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    paul
    Friday, January 22, 2010 6:07 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    David Stawick,
    Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading Commission,
    1155 21st Street, NW,
    Washington, DC 20581
    Jan 22, 2010
    RE: RIN 3038-AC61
    I appreciate any action that can restore financial stability to our world. However, I do not believe that the goal
    will be touched much less met by reducing RETAIL leverage from 100:1 to 10:1. You are talking small bags of
    peanuts in the midst a national level wholesale food distribution center. When Goldman, using (almost) free
    money from the FED, places huge trades that cannot be easily turned around in increasingly volatile markets,
    they panic. When they panic, the rest of us get more regulation and they get bailed out. It is the size of the
    leveraged bet, not the leverage alone that gets us in trouble.
    This regulation is not good and will only create LESS tax revenue and drive business overseas creating even LESS
    tax revenue and jobs.
    JUST SAY NO TO
    i0:i
    Thank you,
    Paul Terwilliger