Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Mills Hollingshaw
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 896
    Date: 1/20/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-00896
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    mills hollingshaw
    Wednesday, January 20, 2010 1:05 AM
    secretary < secretary@ C FTC. g ov >
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    RIN[]3038-AC61
    To Whom it May Concern:
    My brokerage firm, Global Forex Trading, sent me an e-mail making me aware of
    your intention to raise the leverage requirements to 10:1 from the current 100:1
    and while you may see merit in this decision I could not sit by and not try to
    prevent you from doing so. I trade with a very small account of $1,000 dollars of
    which I've lost some of. I am obviously a novice at trading and as such losses are
    to be expected. If you raise this to 10: 1, I will be completely out of this market
    for some time and I think you will have seriously hindered many hundreds of
    people who wish to try their hand at trading. I recognize that you all may feel
    this is for our protection, and perhaps you've received e-mails and other letters
    to that effect, but that is contradictory of this entire profession. This
    is[]a
    risky
    market, that's the point, high risk, high reward. If someone puts all of their life
    savings into an account and then unwisely trades it away, that is their poor
    choice. People who can not accept the loss should never have risked their money.
    I did lose some of my money when I started as the leverage was at 400:1 at the
    time and I had not yet experienced loss on the scale I did. But I learned, as
    should others if they risk too much. If one chooses to over-leverage themselves
    that is again, their choice. We do not need so much protection. So please stop
    mothering us and let the markets continue.