Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Vance Williams
    Organization(s):
    FX Trading Partner Inc

    Comment No: 8374
    Date: 3/17/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-08374
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    FX Trading Partner - Vance
    Wednesday, March 17, 2010 11 :
    16
    PM
    secretary
    Regarding Proposals for Regulation of Retail Forex
    Dear David Stawick,
    This is regarding RIN 3038-AC61
    I have been building a training company since March of 2006. My focus is on the development of currency trading skill. I'm a
    small company and focus on the needs of my clients. The first thing I teach them is how to avoid unnecessary risks that cause
    most traders to fail. It takes a minimum of 4 months and usually 6-12 to complete our basic training. Even then, the client is
    not ready to trade their money. But when they think they are, I impress that if they cannot make money trading $300, they
    certainly cannot make money trading $30,000. The entire focus is not on making lots of money, it is rather on learning to
    make a small profit on a consistent basis. I first applied this in business when I realized that 90% of all of the businesses that
    start up never even make a single dollar. To me it is a principle.
    I realize that it is difficult to decide how to best protect consumers, so I can appreciate the difficult task at hand. I just wanted
    to weigh in and let you know that if you change the leverage to 10:1, that will make it impossible for me to compete with other
    companies and individuals around the world who are totally disregarding any agencies here in the US. After all, price moves
    in our market are measure in 1/10,000
    th
    of a dollar. This is unlike any other market. In addition, the small number of clients I
    have will likely move to other countries with their accounts immediately.
    Note that it was better with the higher leverage of 400:1. This actually minimized our risk here in the US. I was one of the
    individuals who lost money when Refco went bankrupt in 2005. Since then I taught traders that they should keep 25% with
    their broker, and 75% in their US bank, FDIC insured. Since we never exceed 5% risk, this worked just fine. When the rules
    changed to 100:1, nowwe need 50% with the broker. So as the leverage goes down, we are more at risk.
    I just hope the decisions move in a direction that create reasonable rules. I recognize the need to have regulation. I would
    just encourage your team to think about how to best achieve your objective. I think by changing the leverage, all you do is
    move the money offshore and eliminate US competition, which could be instrumental in creating a better, safer culture in this
    industry.
    I wish you the very best, and thank you for reading,
    Vance Williams
    Trainer FX Trading Partner, Inc.
    206-774-0320