Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Michael Bitzenburg
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 7743
    Date: 3/15/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-07743
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Cc:
    Subject:
    Mikebitz
    Monday, March 15, 2010 11:37 PM
    secretary
    [email protected]
    Regulation of Retail Forex RIN 3038-AC61
    To: Mr. David Stawick, Secretary, CFTC
    From: Michael Bitzenburg
    10083 Sakura Dr. Apt. A
    St. Louis, MO 63128
    Phone: 314-843-9704
    Dear Mr. Stawick:
    Please be informed that
    I oppose the proposed 10:1 margin for Forex traders in the U.S.
    The current margin is not "broken", so it doesn't need "fixing". Wall Street, the big banks, and the
    commodity markets need more attention in my opinion. I believe this is pressure from Wall Street and
    the futures exchange to protect their turf. If caught in a lock limit up or down in commodities you can
    lose everything you have and then some. Retirees counting on their "blue chips" for income saw them
    turn into buffalo chips. Bernie Madoffwas not stopped from a scam that was obvious to some, but not
    the SEC. So what's up with our government regulators and agencies? They're protecting the big guys,
    not the little guys in my opinion.
    It's not the Forex traders who need regulating, who can only lose what's in their accounts. This is why I
    choose to trade the Forex. According to seasoned traders, the proposed margin will simply drive traders
    off-shore to trade. The government will lose out on even more revenue, and it can use all it can get now
    and in the distant future as well. Your agency can do the right thing by leaving the margin alone. Please
    leave Forex traders alone and find some bigger fish to fry.
    Kind regards,
    Michael Bitzenburg