Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 89 FR 48968

  • From: Keyonda Smith
    Organization(s):
    KM Smith PhD Consulting

    Comment No: 74315
    Date: 8/7/2024

    Comment Text:

    There are several important distinctions between election futures, such as those provided by platforms like PredictIt, and gambling:

    Explanation and Role

    Election Futures platforms are primarily intended for market research and academic purposes. Participants are given the opportunity to engage in the buying and selling of shares, all based on their predictions of various political events. The main objective is to gather information from a wide range of participants in order to enhance the accuracy of election outcome predictions.

    Let's talk about gambling. It's all about putting your money on the line, hoping to come out on top and maybe even make some extra cash. It's a form of entertainment that's all about the thrill of winning.

    Regulation

    Election Futures platforms like PredictIt adhere to specific regulatory frameworks. As an illustration, PredictIt is able to operate under a "no-action" letter from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). This letter grants PredictIt the ability to run its markets for research purposes, avoiding any classification as illegal gambling.

    Gambling is subject to strict legal regulations and is heavily regulated. In many places, there are specific contexts where it is legal to operate, often requiring a license.

    Market Dynamics

    Election Futures' share prices are subject to constant fluctuations, driven by the collective judgment and information of the participants. This generates a forecast driven by market forces, offering valuable insights into public sentiment and the probability of various outcomes.

    The odds in gambling are determined by bookmakers or casinos and remain constant regardless of the actions of participants. The emphasis is placed on the unpredictable results rather than the gathering of information.

    Risk and Reward

    Election Futures are typically constrained and intended to mirror the likelihood of outcomes rather than being based solely on chance. The goal is to promote informed trading through knowledge and analysis.

    The potential for both risk and reward is typically higher in gambling and determined by chance. Winnings are typically significantly larger in comparison to the stakes, which is a result of the increased risk and unpredictability involved.

    Potential

    Election Futures markets are frequently utilized by researchers and analysts to examine the process of information aggregation and make predictions about outcomes. The data collected possesses substantial educational and predictive value.

    The main objective of gambling is to provide entertainment and generate profits. Typically, the outcomes of gambling do not offer any valuable insights beyond the specific game or bet at hand.

    To summarize, election futures and gambling may seem similar as they both involve placing money on event outcomes. However, election futures are designed to gather information and offer predictive insights within research frameworks, while gambling is primarily focused on entertainment and profit, with distinct regulations and risk factors.

Edit
No records to display.