Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Charles Sturtevant
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 742
    Date: 1/19/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-00742
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    cs
    Tuesday, January 19, 2010 5:18 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Dear Secretary,
    The CFTC proposal RIN 3038-AC61 made public last Thursday is absurd.

    I STRONGLY disagree with the proposal.
    I am not opposed to regulation when it is realistic and serves a useful purpose. Nor am I against
    regulatory agencies when they act in a responsible and transparent manner.
    Forcing a reduction of available leverage on retail forex accounts through regulation, will serve only to
    harm the market.
    The nature of any financial market is risk based to start with, the warnings are everywhere within the
    industry. Those who do not heed the warnings or are not adequately educated may encounter
    unexpected losses. Sure high leverage can get you into trouble if used thoughtlessly. Sure improper
    hedging can turn one loss into two. This is no reason to destroy an industry. Knee jerk legislation is not
    the answer. The solution is education, not restricting what people can and cannot do with their
    investment decisions. This is particularly true when years of activity in the industry indicates no
    substantial number of retail forex traders are being hurt by the existing allowable leverage.
    Leave it
    alone.
    The government is in place to protect people and their property not limit their potential. I believe
    technically the proposed regulation is outside the enumerated powers granted to the government by the
    Constitution.
    I'm currently affiliated with several retail forex groups and recent regulation changes have driven many
    individual investors out of the U.S. Forex market. Is that the goal? I don't think that is the intention, is
    it? I'm sure you'll see a lot of that happening if regulation proposal RIN 3038-AC61 becomes law.
    And incidentally, how many job losses will this regulation inflict? How much in tax revenue will be lost
    as a result? Again, Leave it alone.
    When the profit potential of my investment efforts falls by 90% overnight, I close shop and go where
    the potential hasn't changed. I can say with absolute certainty if this proposal becomes law, my forex
    investment accounts will move overseas, no question about it.
    Thank you,
    Charles Sturtevant
    Aurora, Colorado