Comment for Proposed Rule 89 FR 48968
Note:
If you experience an issue clicking on the "View Comments", the "Submit Comments", or any other buttons, please clear the cache in your browser and refresh the page. In Chrome or Edge, you may refresh the cache by holding down the ctrl key and clicking the F5 button.
-
-
From:
Paul Jackson
Organization(s):
Comment No:
74197
Date:
8/7/2024
Comment Text:
The proposal's "economic purpose" test for contracts is arbitrary. Commissioners should vote no and recognize the real-world hedging use cases identified by economists and businesses.
