Comment for Proposed Rule 89 FR 48968
Note:
If you experience an issue clicking on the "View Comments", the "Submit Comments", or any other buttons, please clear the cache in your browser and refresh the page. In Chrome or Edge, you may refresh the cache by holding down the ctrl key and clicking the F5 button.
-
-
From:
Jonathan Jorgensen
Organization(s):
Comment No:
74152
Date:
8/6/2024
Comment Text:
The legal challenge against the CFTC’s decision is a crucial step for the evolution of financial markets. Kalshi's innovative approach to election futures contracts could provide a much-needed tool for managing political risk, which is often as significant as other economic uncertainties like natural disasters or commodity price shifts.
By offering these contracts in a regulated environment, Kalshi would ensure that all transactions are transparent and subjected to strict oversight, thereby minimizing risks of manipulation and fraud. Unlike traditional gambling, these contracts provide tangible benefits, such as more accurate and immediate data on public sentiment, which can be invaluable for decision-makers.
The CFTC’s role should evolve to accommodate such innovations, ensuring that the U.S. financial markets remain cutting-edge and inclusive. Rather than limiting the scope of what can be regulated, embracing these advancements can help maintain market stability and provide broader access to sophisticated financial instruments. This legal battle is about more than just contracts; it's about adapting to the future and ensuring everyone has the tools to navigate it effectively.
