Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 89 FR 48968

  • From: William L
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 74014
    Date: 8/5/2024

    Comment Text:

    I have over two decades worth of experience forecasting electoral outcomes as a political analyst. I have consistently relied on platforms like Kalshi to enhance the accuracy and depth of my predictions. The proposed ban by the CFTC on election prediction markets strikes at the core of democratic transparency and informed decision-making. These markets not only provide a nuanced understanding of voter sentiments but also serve as critical tools for journalists, policymakers, and the public to gauge the potential outcomes of elections. In my career, I've seen firsthand how these markets contribute to a more informed electorate and facilitate robust discussions on policy implications. Banning them would not only restrict innovation in predictive analytics but also deprive stakeholders of valuable insights into the electoral process. It's imperative that the CFTC extends the comment period to allow for comprehensive input from stakeholders who understand the multifaceted benefits of these markets in enhancing civic engagement and democratic discourse.

Edit
No records to display.