Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: David Roust
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 686
    Date: 1/19/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-00686
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Dave Roust
    Tuesday, January 19, 2010 3:52 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    RE: R1N 3038-AC61
    To Whom It May Concern:
    This is in reference to the proposed 10:1 leverage that you want to place on retail Forex accounts. I am a
    small time Forex trader. I have been trading live for almost a year now. I practiced and studied for two
    years before going live, One important thing I learned in my studies and practices is that Money and
    Risk Management is the key to try to make a living at trading Forex. I realize that 100:1 leverage can be
    dangerous when you don't know how to use it, but when used appropriately, it is essential when trying to
    make a living and dealing with limited capital.
    If this proposal goes through, it WILL put me and many other Forex traders out of business, unless they
    can now multiply the size or their accounts 10 times to be able to trade at current levels with the same
    risk. I am unemployed and can no way afford that. Not to mention the US brokers that will also go out
    of business. More unemployment, just what the country needs.
    This proposal punishes the responsible traders out there. Is this fair?
    For people that will want to continue trading Forex, it will encourage them to move their accounts off-
    shore to find more favorable trading conditions. Although, sending my money to another country is not
    what I feel comfortable with, this change will just put me out of business.
    Thank you for acknowledging my concerns.
    David Roust
    Minneapolis, MN