Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Industry Filing 18-001

  • From: Scott Swartzendruber
    Organization(s):
    Farmer

    Comment No: 61722
    Date: 8/10/2018

    Comment Text:

    I support the evaluation of storage costs and the attempt to address non-convergence, but the timing involved with the evaluation of storage and the extended delay in implementation may not truly address the issue. A more dynamic approach via an annual review process would be a better alternative. This would let conditions at the time determine the appropriate rate and support convergence. The lack of convergence is a key industry issue that needs to be addressed in a more dynamic manner. As a producer, non-convergence has the potential to reduce crop indemnity payments because they are based off of futures prices.

Edit
No records to display.