Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 78 FR 75680

  • From: James F. Meehan
    Organization(s):
    Peterson Oil Company
    Krupa Oil Company
    Torrington Fuel Oil
    Connecticut Energy Marketers Association
    New England Fuel Institute

    Comment No: 59525
    Date: 1/31/2014

    Comment Text:

    The proposal revised rule strengthens the CFTC’s finding that they are mandated by Congress and necessary to ensure market stability and prevent excessive speculation. The proposed rule would limit spot month speculative positions to 25 percent of deliverable supply and limit non-spot month positions to 10 percent of open interest for the first 25,000 contracts and 2.5 percent thereafter.

    I strongly support this long-overdue rule, I also feel these speculation limits are too high to capture all potentially harmful trading activity

    The CFTC should also review changes from the original rule (including to the exemptions for bona fide hedging activity).

    SEE ATTACHED LETTER

    Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    Three Lafayette Centre
    1155 21st Street NW
    Washington, DC 20581

    Dear Acting Chairman Wetjen and Commissioners Chilton and O’Malia:

    I am writing to express my strong support for speculative position limits in commodity derivatives including energy futures, options and swaps, and request that you include my thoughts and concerns on this issue in the public record.

    As you know, commodity derivatives including futures, options and swaps were created as a risk management tool for bona fide hedgers and as a means to discover commodity prices that are based on real-world supply and demand. Speculators serve an important role by taking on the risk that hedgers seek to shed and providing liquidity as necessary to ensure markets are functional. However, speculators should not be allowed to dominate these markets or take such large positions that they distort price discovery, exacerbate market volatility or manipulate prices.

    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has a statutory obligation, if not a compelling moral obligation, to limit the role of financial speculators in the commodity markets and bar them from unwarranted exemptions. In light of this, I commend you for this long-overdue proposed rule to establish limits on speculative positions in energy futures and swaps and other commodity derivatives. However, the proposed rule would set spot-month position limits at 25 percent of deliverable supply. This is much too high to capture all potentially harmful trading activity. A lower limit is necessary to ensure market stability and prevent market manipulation.

    In considering the rule, I urge Commissioners to look past the opposition by Wall Street groups and remember the affect that excessive speculation has had on businesses, consumers and the broader economy. I urge you to establish restrictive speculative position limits and impose them expeditiously in order to restore stability and confidence to the U.S. commodity markets.

    Thank you for your consideration.

    Sincerely,

    James F. Meehan
    CEO / President
    Peterson Oil Company
    Krupa Oil Company
    Torrington Fuel Oil
    276 Main Street
    P.O. Box 31
    Portland, CT 06480