Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for General CFTC CFTC Staff to Host Public Roundtable to Discuss the "Futurization of Swaps"

  • From: William F Derbyshire
    Organization(s):
    self

    Comment No: 59103
    Date: 1/29/2013

    Comment Text:

    WinJammer auditing capabilities‏

    Actions

    william derbyshire ([email protected])
    6:12 PM
    To: [email protected]
    Picture of william derbyshire

    CFTC Staff to Host a Public Roundtable to Discuss Proposed Rulemaking Enhancing Protections Afforded Customers and Funds Deposited by Customers
    01/29/2013 05:38 PM EST


    The above relation of compliance summary provisions is subsequent to the provision of an entity maintaining the persons of employee and the persons of agile to conform to the required acceptance of provision of the SEC and CFTC requirements of Contract in State and Country of obligatory compliance provisions.

    Would it not make sense for the SEC, CFTC, UNIX, Microsoft(Excel), Quickbooks, Oracle and all other financial design agencies to have Winjammer as an integral part of the system requirements of design and compatibility? This obligatory regulation would infer the requirement that all States to refrain from Verbal Contract laws as such in the State of California. By implementing this provision the Oral'/Verbal Contract provision would be nullified in all States and the Tax provision would predicate the growth of the United States and the growth of financial industry. The prior subsequent growth objective as outlined by Commissioner Chilton and the Department of the Interior for the obligation of the labor growth in the financial industry would be put into a fast tract as well if this growth objective is met and put into action. Additionally if this is provisioned by the Regulators and Commissions is put into action, the State degradation of growth in the construction and international growth objectives could be met.

    The requirement of provisional law stipulates that contractors and such implement the aspect of FCM's and SRO's as part of the contract requirement provision. In the state of California the law specified in Contractor Law, an RME(responsible managing employee) or and a RMO(responsible managing officer) or the contractor of proprietary signatory is the only source of signatory regulation. Dead beacon in linguistics should also be met as a provision of this change in software. The stream lining of terminology in all states in conjunction with mandated SEC and Contract law requirements would effectuate the regulation of all non-compliant work that takes place within and outside of our city centres.

    In addition to this the redaction of Denial of Service(such as in California) would be nullified in due part by the mandate of redaction of the Oral/Verbal Contracts that take place in States such as California. This would increase the ability for financial regulatory compliance and the addition ability for compliance agencies to enforce financial obligations of all workers, no just the workers whom chose to follow your laws and regulatory compliance proceed law. You have remember that the indigent population works under the table nullifying the ability for compliance agencies to obtain and forward the due process of agency in State.

    Whom is to say that entities such as E+Y could not take a verbal contract then adhere the contract through a subsequently derived developer agency at a lower rate than originally agreed upon...
    A single person could start a new corporation every day and hide the verbal financial contract a periodicity that would be untraceable...

    Implementing changes in law and implementing WinJammer as a mandated part of all computer systems as a obligatory compliance proceedure would in effect take care of all of the issues at hand in this above relational roundtable commission meeting.

    The 300% for self insured contractors and the 125% requirement for proprietors and corporations would be regulated on a second by second basis verses a daily or monthly or at best a semi-annual and annual as in stipulation of prime rate contractors of today(according to California State law that is...)

    Remember that all contracts...financial or other have the same risk analysis requirements in juridic... as per CH laws in the intercontinental exchange requirements of reserved entity obligations... risk assessment is just that and required by law to followed internationally. When Countries allow States to redact in Juridic the obligation becomes nullified and disrupts the process of financial growth in the Country of origin.


    Could the CME Group tell me about all the capabilities of the WinJammer system so I can make a more refined commentary of the works of the WinJammer product?

    bill
    [email protected]

    p.s. I am a potential cme group employee and would hope your entity will take this email into consideration

    http://winjammer.futures.org/WinJammerMain.aspx
    http://cslb.ca.gov
    https://www.theice.com/homepage.jhtml
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/78f
    http://-site-submit.x=0&search-site-submit.y=0&client=cftc_v01r01&output=xml_no_dtd&proxystylesheet=cftc_v01r01&sort=date%3ad%3al%3ad1&entqr=3&oe=utf-8&ie=utf-8&ud=1&filter=0&site=cftc/

Edit
No records to display.