Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Gregory J Gianoni
    Organization(s):
    Bentley University Alumni

    Comment No: 5782
    Date: 3/3/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-05782
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Greg Gianoni
    Wednesday, March 3, 2010 8:28 PM
    secretary
    Concerning Leverage Cap
    To Whom This May Concern:
    I understand there is much controversy in regards to whether or not the leverage cap should be changed
    to 10:1. I am new to the currency markets but have been trading equities for a few years. I have a
    degree in economics and finance from Bentley University and am a financial advisor. It is my belief
    that if the leverage were changed, the market would become illiquid, many people would discontinue
    trading because the potential for profits is much less. This would give way for institutional investors to
    more adequately manipulate the markets. A decrease in private investors will mean less commissions
    from the spreads of trades for companies such as forex. As private trading decreases, these companies
    will make less money, resulting in less revenue, forcing a cost cut and potential layoffs. At a time when
    we should be creating jobs, we would be doing the exact opposite. The only good reason to change the
    leverage would be to take the risk off the table for people that invest too aggressively. This could easily
    be diverted by slightly increasing the margin and forced stop losses in people's accounts. Although I
    would also be against that, it would be much more effective and less destructive than adjusting the
    leverage ratio.
    I appreciate your time. If you have any questions or comments feel free to contact me via this email
    address.
    Regards,
    Gregory J. Gianoni
    Bentley University Alumni
    Economics-Finance
    Law & Psychology Minors
    Tel: (860) 384-2582
    Email: [email protected]