Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Neil Douglas
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 5745
    Date: 3/3/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-05745
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Neil Douglas
    Wednesday, March 3, 2010 7:35 PM
    secretary < secretary@ C FTC. g ov >
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Dear David Sawick,
    I strongly appose the 10:1 leverage cap.
    The fundamental cause of economic failure is the lack of government regulation in lending policy
    and NOT the "traders" ability to shorta market in a highly leveraged position. The market sets the
    price NOT the individual trader or group of traders shorting it. If it has been shorted toa low level
    the buyers come in force to buy up cheap contracts. Demand and supply is a fact. Why did
    traders want to short the market? Because it was overpriced based on the irresponsible lending
    practices by greedy banks. Shorting the market was nota cause ofcollapse...the lending practices
    were.
    To cap the leverage on a market from 200:1 before the crash, then to 100:1 now and the proposed
    10:1 in future is merely going to reduce liquidity and profit. The bigger bank players will make less
    profits themselves and will pass that on to the average every day bank customer which will in turn
    slow down the economic recovery.
    You wanta safe secure market system? Target the asses responsible for the crash and leave the
    ones that profit from fluctuations by making trades based on external market conditions.
    Yes I am atrader. My profit potential has already been halved. Ido NOT want to see my profit
    potential go to 20 times less than it was a year ago.
    Lets cut you salary by that much and see how you like it.
    The government wants to be seen to be doing something useful? Go do something useful...not
    this.
    Neil Douglas.