Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Scarlett Stone
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 5627
    Date: 2/28/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-05627
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Scarlett Stone
    Sunday, February 28, 2010 12:52 PM
    secretary
    RE: RIN 3038-AC61 Stawick
    I am sending you a quote from a blog in which I participate.
    While it does not directly address the 10:1 fiasco that you are promulgating, it does beg a question: why in hell are
    you pestering the retail trade when you give these kinds of antics below a pass?
    Read in quotes:
    BTW, if you are curious as to how Gensler spends his time when he is not trying to bust up the "mom
    and pop" entrepreneurial efforts of retail fx traders, please see below:
    "Gone are Hank Paulson and Neel Kashkari; in their place are Treasury chief of staff Mark Patterson and
    CFTC chief Gary GENSLER, both former Goldmanites. (Gensler was the firm's co-head of finance.) And
    instead of credit derivatives or oil futures or mortgage-backed CDOs, the new game in town, the next
    bubble, is in carbon credits a booming trillion- dollar market that barely even exists yet, but will if
    the Democratic Party that it gave $4,452,585 to in the last election manages to push into existence a
    groundbreaking new commodities bubble, disguised as an "environmental plan," called cap-and-trade.
    The new carbon-credit market is a virtual repeat of the commodities-market casino that's been kind to
    Goldman, except it has one delicious new wrinkle: If the plan goes forward as expected, the rise in
    prices will be government-mandated. Goldman won't even have to rig the game. It will be rigged in
    advance."
    I forget and wish you would remind me: whose back are you protecting again?