Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Michael Delfino
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 5619
    Date: 2/27/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-05619
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    mike delfino
    Saturday, February 27, 2010 7:28 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Sir, Madam
    I'd like to respectfully alert you about the unintended consequences of limiting leverage to 10: 1. I trade forex for a
    living to support myself and my family (my wife and my three children) in this difficult economic times for our
    country ( my wife and myself were laid off due to the recession in 2008). I chose to open a trading account with a
    U.S based forex dealer merchant (FDM) that is a member of the National Futures Association and is registered with
    the CFTC as a Futures Commission Merchant (FCM). I believe that the funds in my trading account are safe due to
    the oversight provided by the NFA and the CFTC. However if the proposal of limiting leverage to 10:1 come to pass
    it will definetly forced me and thousands of fellow U.S based traders to move our trading accounts to Canada,the
    UK, Switzerland or Dubai where there's no limit on leverage. We cannot make a living and support our families with
    only a
    10:1 leverage limit. This proposed rule will not
    " protect" me nor my fellow traders from losing money when trading forex. It will only hurt my trading profits by
    limiting my positions size and prompting margin calls sooner. All the U.S. based Forex brokers - dealers already
    comply with the NFA disclosures requirements about the risks involved with forex trading on margin using leverage.
    It's been my experience with meeting forex traders at trading events and participating in online trading forums that
    the overwhelming majority of forex retail traders are sophisticated investors who understand the risks they're taking
    when using leverage. Leverage is more or less risky depending on the strategy. An arbitrary leverage 10: 1, 50: 1,
    100:1 etc.. is meaningless unless the trading strategy employed is referred to also.
    One size doesn't fit
    all.
    I
    strongly believe that by simply requiring clients of retail forex brokers to take an online competency test to verify
    and certify that the particular client understands the true risks involved in using
    leverage; and depending on his passing score he gets "qualified" to trade with 100:1 or 50:1 or 10:1 etc..maximum
    leverage to protect him/her from himself/herself. If the CFTC is worried about forex brokers-dealers "taking
    advantage" of uninformed customers/traders trough leverage then certifying the traders should resolve that concern.
    Sincerely,
    Michael Delfino
    31-28 35th street Apt 16
    11106 -Long Island City- NY