Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: John Baur
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 50
    Date: 1/15/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-00050
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    john baur
    Friday, January 15, 2010 7:36 AM
    secretary
    Regarding Regulation of Retail Forex
    Dear Secretary,
    Regarding regulation of retail forex leverage, I would like to point out the ramifications of such measures. By
    reducing the leverage to 10:1 in the retail forex market, the U.S could potentially lose "TRILLIONS" of dollars over
    the next few decades. The money flowing out of the U.S. is incalcuable, if such measures were taken. This market is
    in it's infancy and by regulating in such a manner could retard the the retail growth in the U.S. considerably, not to
    mention the billions of dollars it could potentially cost the treasury. The bank lobby is very strong in D.C. as you
    know, and I am sure there is a lot of pressure to implement such regulation, but by doing so you will increase
    volatility and reduce liquidity in a global market that needs neither. Let's face it, the banks want to keep the game
    the same for as long as they can because it benefits them, but what they don't seem to realize is that they are only
    hurting themselves in the long run. This market is one of the fastest growing markets the world has ever seen and
    needs to be regulated as such. Reducing the leverage in the retail forex market does not protect the retail trader, it
    only hurts the retail broker. The U.K. would love this type of regulation, insuring that they would control the retail
    forex market. Please consider the ramifications of such regulation before taking such draconian measures.
    Sincerely, John Baur
    Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection.
    S!gn up now.