Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Taylor Stockwell
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 495
    Date: 1/19/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-00495
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Taylor Stockwell
    Tuesday, January 19, 2010 11:31 AM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Re: ID Number RIN 3038-AC61
    To Whom it May Concern:
    I am fiercely opposed to the proposed leverage change represent in the CFTC's latest regulation
    proposal. While I appreciate the efforts that the CFTC is making to stabilize the retail forex market,
    there must be balance between stabilizing the market and promoting growth. As a long-time retail trader,
    I, and many, many others, will move our accounts elsewhere if this rule is accepted.
    The 10:1 leverage rule represents an overly aggressive approach to dealing with potential business losses
    resulting from Forex trading. It seems that the CFTC is attempting to protect me from myself. I'm sorry,
    but, that is simply unacceptable. Following are some valid reasons for leaving leverage at 100:1 or
    GREATER.
    1) Retail traders use leverage as a protection against broker failure risk. I do this. I keep cash in my other
    bank accounts and smaller amounts of funds with my brokers. I don't want to lose my funds due to a
    broker bankruptcy. If you can guarantee me that this will never happen, then I might be willing to
    consider this as an option. Unfortunately, this isn't a guarantee that you will ever be able to make.
    2) I and other traders will move our accounts offshore. All of your policies will then be for nought if
    there are no more traders trading in the US FX market.
    3) Brokers will go out of business.
    4) Retail traders will lose a major source of income.
    5) Jobs will be lost or moved to offshore firms.
    6) Tax revenues from traders and firms will vanish.
    There are far more reasons to leave the leverage at higher levels than to move them down. If you are
    aiming to kill the US Forex industry, this will certainly succeed. If you are out to protect Americans
    from predatory practices, this will fail as traders will move offshore. In all, this is a very, very bad idea.
    Regards,
    Taylor Stockwell
    13604 Winterberry Ridge
    Midlothian, VA 23112