Comment Text:
I oppose this rule and concur with the NY Times Editorial.
Mr. Geithner?s Loophole, Published: April 30, 2011
In an announcement on Friday afternoon ? the time slot favored by officials eager to avoid scrutiny ? the Treasury Department said it intends to exempt certain foreign exchange derivatives from key new regulations under the Dodd-Frank law. These derivatives represent a $4 trillion-a-day market, one that is very lucrative for the big banks that trade them.
A loophole in the law ? which the bankers and their friends, including the administration, fought for ? allows the Treasury secretary to exempt the instruments. The arguments in favor of exemption, beyond a desire to please the banks, were always unconvincing. They still are. The Treasury Department has asserted that the exempted market is not as risky as other derivatives markets, and therefore does not need full regulation.
That claim has been disputed by research, but even if it were true, it would be a weak argument. For instruments to be relatively safer than the derivatives that blew up in the crisis, necessitating huge bailouts, hardly makes them safe. Worse, dealers could probably find ways to manipulate the exempted transactions so as to hedge and speculate in ways that the law is intended to regulate.
The Treasury Department insists its exemption is narrow and regulators will have the power to detect unlawful manipulation. In their spare time, perhaps? The financial crisis made clear what happens when everyone doesn?t have to play by the same rules. And it made clear that the taxpayer are the ones who pay the price.
The department has also said that because the market works well today, new rules could actually increase instability. That is perhaps the worst argument of all. It validates the antiregulatory ethos that led to the crisis and still threatens to block reform.
The Treasury?s plan will be open for comment for 30 days. Count us opposed.
