Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Brian Meland
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 4036
    Date: 1/26/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-04036
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Stawick, David
    Tuesday, January 26, 2010 10:02 AM
    secretary
    FW: STRONGLY OBJECT TO 10-1 LEVERAGE LIMIT IN REGULATION OF
    RETAIL FOREX PROPOSAL RIN 3038-AC61
    From:
    brian meland [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent:
    Tuesday, January
    26,
    2010 10:00 AN
    To:
    secretary
    Cc:
    StawJck, David; Smith, Thomas J.; Bauer, Jennifer; Penner, William; Cummings, Christopher W.; Sanchez,
    Peter
    Subject: STRONGLY OBJECT TO 10-1 LEVERAGE LINIT IN REGULATION OF RETAIL FOREX PROPOSAL RIN
    3038-AC61
    Attn
    :
    David Stawick, Secretary, CFTC and ALL CFTC policymakers:
    As a non-affiliated US-based Retail FX trader, please note for the record that I am STRONGLY
    OPPOSED to the 10-1 leverage limit as proposed in RIN 3038-AC61 relating to the Regulation of
    Retail Forex.
    Counter-productive effects
    This senseless limit would in NO way protect, aid or benefit me but rather would greatly harm me since
    this restriction, if passed,
    would require that I submit substantially more margin-funds into non-protected, non-FDIC
    insured, non-SIPC eligible accounts, actually exposing me to increased risk in the event of
    bankruptcy of my Forex Broker.
    would NOT divert my business into regulated-Futures trading (as the CFTC is probably hoping),
    but rather would cause me to seek an unreliable, higher-risk offshore FX broker to trade through,
    whose practices might be questionable.
    would eliminate one of the greatest benefits of trading Forex : My ability to efficiently deploy my
    own trading capital in the way that I choose.
    Lower FX vols require far greater leverage
    FX volatilities are generally substantially lower than in the Equities or Futures market. Therefore,
    significantly more leverage is required simply to capture equivalent trading opportunities.
    Nanny not needed
    I do not want the CFTC to treat me like a child and dictate how I should trade. While 100-1 leverage is
    available to me - should I choose it - I am never forced to use it. The bottom line is that OTC Retail
    Forex trading is NOT Futures trading. Please do not try to treat it as such!i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-04036
    PLEASE IMMEDIATELY STRIKE YOUR PROPOSED 10-1 LEVERAGE LIMITATIONS.
    Don't let proposal RIN 3038-AC61 become an expensive lesson in unintended consequences ....
    Thank you.