Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Norma LaVigne
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 3828
    Date: 1/25/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-03828
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Norma
    Monday, January 25, 2010 4:24 PM
    secretary
    "Regulation of Retail Forex"
    I think changing maximum leverage to 10:1 is an exceedingly bad idea. And it seems
    particularly unreasonable considering the Futures market is 20:1 or more.
    First you took away our ability to trade precious metals in our Forex accounts. Then, with the
    FIFO ruling, you compromised our ability to employ hedging strategies.., or even run two
    trading systems at the same time in the same account. And now you want to further cripple
    our money-making ability by raising the margin requirement.
    You can get 100:1 leverage in Canada and the UK. Limiting leverage in the US would put an
    unfair burden on traders and brokers alike.
    On the other hand.., as a defrauded customer of RefcoFX... I'm in favor of regulation
    designed to protect traders from broker-fraud. For example, I think Forex brokers should be
    required to segregate funds and carry insurance.., same as with the Futures market.., and
    same as the UK and Canada. How about focusing on something like that?
    Thank you,
    Norma LaVigne