Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Charles R Rietz
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 3795
    Date: 1/25/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-03795
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    WF G
    Monday, January 25, 2010 2:16 PM
    secretary
    RE: Comments on Proposed FX Regs.
    Atttention CFTC:
    Re: Commmentary on proposed CFTC regs on Forex--as requested
    As part of the proposed regulations, it is stated." "leverage in retail forex
    customer accounts wouM be subject to a l O-to-1 fimitation, "which means 10:1
    leverage wouM be the maximum amount allowed for all Forex traders in the U.S.
    This will mean that to trade a single standard lot of $100,000 one wouldl need $10,000 in your
    account. Currently it can be as little as $1000 (100:1) in the U.S. and $250 in the U.K. (400:1)!
    How does this "help" U.S. retail traders or the FX Industry in U.S.??
    The government is suppose to be helping the retail Forex trader by providing a safe
    environment via regulations--that is, safe from fraud and unfair practices--NOT safe
    from risk in the market. The Risk in the market is what makes profits possible for
    investors, hedging of risk available for those who have currency risks in their
    business, and provides liquidity in this public market.
    Reducing the leverage to
    10:1
    will reduce not only the risk but the profit opportunity for the retail trader and increase
    the hedging cost for hedgers of currency risk.
    This does not serve the public--rather
    damages the FX Trader by reducing his profit opportunity- - and increases the cost of
    hedgeing risk -- thus weakening the economy even more than it is. WHERE IS THE
    BENEFIT? TO WHOM?
    In addition, the proposed regs will drive more FX business to off-shore brokers--which
    has already begun due to recent regs passed that were also damaging to the retail
    trader's profit potential in Forex. This will also have a negative impact on U.S.
    employment in the industry due to more investors rushing to offshore brokers.
    Some regulation to keep out the scams is justifiable. But TOO MUCH regulation is
    damaging to the benefits of a "free Market" and the public on both sides--invetors and
    hedgers-- who can benefit therefrom.
    In my opinion and virtually ALL of those in the industry with whom I have spoken,
    THESE PROPOSED REGS ARE TOO MUCH AND DAMAGE THE FREE MARKET AND
    ITS BENEFITS TO INVESTORS, HEDGERS AND THE ECONOMY!
    Yours truly,
    Charles R. Rietz, FX Trader
    Gilbert, AZ