Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Barnaby Beech
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 369
    Date: 1/18/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-00369
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Barnaby Beech
    Monday, January 18, 2010 7:06 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    As a participating retail forex customer, I am interested in the motivation behind the proposed legislation
    to reduce available margins to 1:10, indicating that any trader would have to provide one thousand
    dollars in margin to be able to trade a single mini lot. As someone who has benefited extensively from
    higher margin levels, e.g. 1:100 and even 1:200, the thought of losing the capacity to leverage larger
    sums is disheartening. At the risk of appearing callous, could the motivation to reduce the trading
    margins be traced to larger banks who wish to remain as isolated as possible from the increasing
    numbers of the retail forex customers and reduce their ability to take profits? The only other motive I
    can think of for the introduction of such legislation is consumer protection, which, I believe, is more
    constructively served by allowing the market to regulate itself. In other words, to allow a trader to lose
    big, if they should be so unwitting as to allow that to happen, as opposed to imposing protectionist
    measures which would bar many investors from participating in the market at all. That is, of course, if
    consumer protection is truly the issue behind the proposal for such legislation. Thank you for your time.