Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Ronda Jordan
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 3621
    Date: 1/24/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-03621
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Ronda Jordan
    Sunday, January 24, 2010 8:43 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    To whom it may concern:
    My comments are directed toward the proposed CTFC 10:1 leverage limit. My main concern with this level of
    government intervention are the unintended consequences. For some, mainly large institutions, this may not
    affect them too much. However, for the retail trader and broker this regulation will be catastrophic. If this passes,
    it is likely to end retail forex brokering in the United States.
    It is not the 100:1 leverage that is the problem, but the lack of education and knowledge about the foreign
    exchange market.
    Forex trading is not easy and those that succeed do so after much investment of education, money and time.
    This is true of any business, first you educate yourself on your market, product and the financial ins and outs, then
    you launch your business. With good money management and understanding of market forces hopefully the
    business is viable and profitable. If you rush into the business without a good plan and understanding of your
    market then you will lose your investment.
    The government's regulatory role in the forex market should be to protect us from fiscal fraud, not from
    being able to click buy or sell with some leverage. I have looked at how this will affect my trading and
    surmised that I will have no choice but find a reputable broker overseas. I do not wish to do this as I
    believe in free enterprise and would like to see small businesses be helped instead of hindered by
    government intervention.
    Thank you for your concern,
    Ronda Jordan