Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Carl Scott
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 3585
    Date: 1/24/2010

    Comment Text:

    io-ooi
    COMMENT
    CL-03585
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Carl Scott
    Sunday, January 24, 2010 5:57 PM
    secreta ry < secreta ry@ C FTC. g ov >
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Dear Sir/ Madam,
    I would just like to quickly comment on one aspect of the proposed regulations: The wildly
    controversial lowering of the leverage.
    I am not a US citizen, so my comments may not mean anything, but I do use a US broker (as do
    many other foreigners. I am Australian) and as such I will be one of the private traders vastly
    affected by this move. I'm not going to say much, as Im sure there will be many, far more
    eloquent, people explaining to you how essentially every other trader, bank and institution must
    feel about this. All I can ask is that you reconsider. There is no upside. The impact on traders, on
    the US economy, will be phenomenal. You won't be just shooting yourself in the foot, you'll be
    blowing off the entire top half of your body.
    There is no need to impose a nanny-state. You are not China. The people can look after
    themselves, the banks have already learned some lessons over the last couple of years. If you feel
    the available leverage needs to be lowered somewhat, move it to 75:1. 10:1 is massive overkill.
    Thanks for listening,
    Carl Scott (AU)
    Start searching NOW! Search for properties that match your lifestyle!