Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 76 FR 4752

  • From: Lynne Thomas
    Organization(s):
    Retired

    Comment No: 30231
    Date: 2/26/2011

    Comment Text:

    Dear Chairman Gensler,
    Although the situation described is for gold, this editorial from FMX Metals Connect on February 25th explains why a 1500 contract limit for silver should be established instead of the current staff proposal.

    Please use your authority to institute accordingly.

    Editorial comment: It’s becoming increasingly annoying watching dealers buy call and sell puts the day before we rally $20, and then the next day buy put and sell call before we drop $20. Yesterday’s sell off from the 1415 area seemed almost orchestrated. At the very least, the futures selling came in during the thinnest trading hours. While exchanges herald the benefits of electronic trading there is one thing wrong with it. Electronic trading minimizes the information leakage associated with using brokers, for sure, but it is also allows oligarchic organizations to anonymously manage price movement while hiding behind digital displays. We won’t use the word manipulate, in part because of our libertarian bent, but it’s getting ridiculous. Where there used to be 50 5-lot thieves on the floor now there are five Too-Big-To-Fail banks with infinite fed-sponsored balance sheets doing whatever they please. The idiot locals on the floor, fragmented as they were, served to keep the big banks in check because there was transparency of price and to a large extent, the players were known. This doesn’t exist anymore and we don’t see an end to it. Instead of thinning the forest for the trees, technology, regulatory and economic factors have killed the saplings and destroyed market diversity. This translates to a narrow and deep liquidity pool in trading venues; god forbid if one of them fails.

Edit
No records to display.