Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Peter L Barlow
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 2999
    Date: 1/22/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-02999
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Peter Barlow < [email protected] >
    Friday, January 22, 2010 8:01 PM
    secreta ry < secreta ry@ C FTC. g ov >
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    David Stawick
    Secretary
    Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    1155 21st Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20581
    Dear Secretary Stawick,
    I would like to officially levy my protest against the potential new retail forex regulation regarding
    a 10:1 leverage policy for US-based forex brokers. I firmly believe that this new regulation, if
    employed, will force tens of thousands of US traders offshore to potentially illegitimate and/or
    inappropriate brokerages that are under-regulated and under-funded and thus creating
    potentially more damaging situations for these traders than the rule would protect.
    As a trader, I certainly understand the need for your agency to help provide a decent level of
    safety and protection in a business that is often misunderstood by new traders and sometimes
    fraught with brokerages that are little more than scare artists. However, only allowing a 10:1
    leverage capability will not allow smaller, retail traders like me the chance to grow an account
    balance with smart, well-placed trading strategies. Rather, people like me will be forced to trade
    offshore with firms that do not have appropriate agencies such as yours to provide some
    reasonable protection.
    Secretary Stawick, I am asking that you and your agency perform some additional due diligence
    and analysis before making the final decision on the 10:1 leverage policy. US-based forex retail
    traders (like me) will be very appreciative of these types of efforts and support. Thank you for
    your time and consideration.
    Sincerely,
    PLBarlo w