Comment Text:
10-005
COMMENT
CL-02894
Harvey Organ - [email protected]
Gary Gensler, Chairman
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
3 Lafayette Centre
1155 21st St. NW
Washington, DC 20581
C.F.T.O.
OFFICE OF THE SEOR~ARIAT
2010
29
12 OH
Comments for the Commission for the Public Hearing on the Metals
Markets, March 25, 2010
Mr Chairman and Commissioners of the CFTC,
I would like to thank you for allowing me to present to the Commission as to whether there is a
need for position limits on the precious metals such as silver and gold.
The Bank Participation Report of August 2008, a report which the BIS uses to gauge risks to
banks, revealed that one or two USA banks held a massive short position in silver of some
33,805 contracts or 169 million ozs of silver. In the July Bank Participation Report, these same
two banks, held a short position of 6,199 contracts or 31 Million ozs. The increase in silver short
was an astonishing 138 million ozs of silver.
Here is the information from the reports
07/01/08 CMX SILVER
U.S.
2
22
0.0
6,199
4.8
NON U.S.
i0
3,829
2.9
3,924
3.0
130,495
12
3,851
3.0
10,123
7.8
08/05/08 CMX SILVER
U.S.
2
0 0.0
33,805 25.4
NON U.S.
ii
8,287
6.2
5,791 4.3
13
8,287
6.2
39,596
29.7
Here is a link to the report:
133,255
httl~www, cftc. ggy~rn a rk~o rtsi ba ~ nd ~_x, htrr~
All mining activity throughout the world produces 680 million oz annually. This increase in the
silver short represents 20% of all mine production. With respect to the total short position of 169
million oz, this represents 25% of all annual mine production of silver. To my knowledge, this is
the largest concentration of a short position in any commodity.
In gold, in the July Bank Participation Report, the summary revealed that 3 or less banks held a
short position of 7,787 contracts of gold or 778,700 ozs.10-005
COMMENT
CL-02894
However, in the August Bank Participation Report, there was a massive 11 fold increase in the
short position by these same three or less banks with the short position rising to 86,398 contracts
or 8.64 million oz from the July report of 778,700 ozs. The increase in the short position by these
banks, as represented in the Bank Participation Report, totaled 7.81 million oz of gold. With world
production of gold at 75 million oz, the increase represented approximately 11% of annual world
production.
Here is the information from the reports
07/01/08 CMX GOLD
U.S.
3
13,168
3.0
7,787 1.8
NON U.S.
23
21,036
4.8
65,588 15.1
434,024
26
34,204
7.9
73,375 16.9
08/05/08 ClVlX GOLD
U.S.
3
4,170
1.0
86,398 21.2
NON U.S.
22
20,214
4.9
54,267 13.3
408,430
25
24,384
6.0
140,665 34.4
On Nov 12, 2009, the BIS released its regular semi-annual OTC report on precious metals
derivatives of the major banks and financial dealers in the G10 and Switzerland ending June 30,
2009, covering the period Jan 1, 2009 through to June 30, 2009. The release of the BIS report
comes right after the violent activity on the Comex from August through to Oct 2008.
With respect to gold, the total notional amount of gold derivatives in the USA actually fell from 107
billion to 99 billion dollars. Yet JPMorgan's position remained relatively unchanged, falling from
82.5 billion dollars worth of gold to 81.2 billion dollars worth of gold. As far as risk, JPMorgan has
almost 82% of the USA derivative risk!
In the BIS report, with respect to gold, the total gold derivatives attributed to the banks rose from
332 billion dollars to 425 billion dollars which is made up of $179 billion of forwards or swaps and
$246 billion of options.
In tonnage of gold, the increase in derivatives totaled 2,300 tonnes, wherein 1800 tonnes of gold
increase came by way of forwards and swaps and 500 tonnes by way of options.
Clearly, the derivatives substantially increased and thus exposing the banking sector to great risk.
The gold derivatives are illustrated by the following graphs:10-005
COMMENT
CL-02894
OTC Gold Derivatives
700
600
500
400
300
2OO
100
[] Options (US$)
[] Forwa='ds & Swaps (US$)
and this graph:
OTC Gold Derivatives - Tonnes
Calculated at Period-end Gold Price
6O
5O
40
[] Forwards &
Swaps (-ronnes)
~
30
[]
Options (Tonnes)
~
~
~
[]
Triennial Total (Tonnes)
~- 20
With respect to silver, the BIS calculated that the total derivatives have peaked at a new high of
203 billion US dollars.
The increase in derivatives in silver alone totaled 2.8 billion oz.
The total forwards in silver which generally is perceived as the total short, absent any better data,
totaled 7.5 billion oz.
This increase alone represented 4 times the annual production of silver. The total short or
forward position of silver, i.e. the 7.5 billion oz represented over 10 years of silver production.
This is demonstrated in the following graphs:10-005
COMMENT
CL-02894
250
Other Precious Metals (U$$)
200
150
100
5O
and in tonnage:
[] Optio.~ |US$]
[] Fo~wa~d~ t~ Swap~ [US$|
Other Precious M, etals - Expressed in Ounces Ag
Calculated at Period-end Silver Price (London
20
15
10
5
0
Fo~wa~d~ & Swap~ [Oz.
Period-end Silve~ P~ice
To my knowledge, this level of concentration has never happened in any commodity!
It is important to realize that the BIS only records risk to its bankers.
Thus if a bank is long in one jurisdiction and short in another, the BIS would cancel the two as
there is no risk to the banks. However, despite the netting in gold and silver by the BIS, this
central bank perceives considerable risk in the forwards on both silver and gold to the banks.
In silver, Ted Butler has calculated that the total short position on the Comex silver futures
equates to approximately 500 million oz of which JPMorgan accounts for 200 million of those oz.
Clearly, this bank dominates the short position and because of their size, they totally dominate
the silver market.
We must ask ourselves this major question: why are these massive short positions in both gold
and silver not manipulative? Even though the CFTC opened its 3rd investigation into silver, they
have not as of yet, answered the simple question as to how these actions by these banks are not
manipulative.
We must question the real legitimate business that these banks do by shorting silver and gold in
such large quantities in a rather short period of time.10-005
COMMENT
CL-02894
In the turmoil in August-Sept 2008 billions of dollars were lost by investors by the shorting action
of the banks in question.
Most commodities on the Comex have position limits of approximately 1 to 2% of annual
production. This has worked well over the years. In gold and certainly in silver, these limits have
been exceeded and thus we are witnessing manipulation on a daily basis on a rather large scale.
I urge the commission to place position limits on the precious metals and these limits must be
placed whether it is on the short side or the long side.
I propose that all players wishing to hedge must deposit 40% of the short position in bullion in the
Comex warehouse and must sign an affidavit that the hedger has 100% of the title to the metal
and undertakes to not encumber the title in any way while it serves as collateral to the short
position. Furthermore, no derivative position should be eligible to serve as collateral for a hedge
position.
I thank you for your kind attention.
Yours sincerely,
Harvey Organ
