Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Sunshine Act Sunshine Act Meeting: March 25, 2010

  • From: Jason Hommel
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 22915
    Date: 3/23/2010

    Comment Text:

    10-005
    COIMMENT
    CL-02616
    Grnail - Silver Stock Report: Metals Position Limits
    Page 1 of 7
    Bob Wester
    Silver Stock Report: Metals Position
    1 message
    Jason Hommel

    Reply-To: j@silverstockreport com
    To: [email protected]
    Limits
    Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:02 PM
    Having trouble viewing this email? Click here
    God Bless You!
    You may unsubscribe if you no longer wish to receive our emails,
    etais Position Limits
    (To the CFTC!)
    Silver Stock Report
    by Jason Hommel, March 23rd, 2010
    To the CFTC:
    RE: metals position limits
    Regarding the Dire Necessity of Imposing Metals Position Limits on the Shorts
    Others have written to the cFTC as if they assume the CFTC is made up of good people who would enforce
    position limits if only they knew that the markets were manipulated; and thus, two others have written the
    CFTC to show the current manipulation in progress.
    I'm not so gracious, as I have written to the CFTC before, and I know that the CFTC has always evaded the
    issues. Therefore, I must assume the CFTC is made up of people who only think they are doing good, who
    assume that letting big banks get what they want is somehow compatible with free market theory, and thus,
    not regulating the bankers' position limits is somehow good, and that hiding the truth is somehow good for the
    nation.
    Thank you, Bart Chilton, for writing that
    "he
    does not think his fellow commissioners are currently willing to
    support a move to curb speculation for metals contracts" so that we can help to persuade them.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE62L3YP20100322
    I believe that the CFTC commissioners are either deceived by a faulty philosophical foundation, or willingly in
    on the manipulation.
    Alan Greenspan admitted his concepts of free market theory were flawed. I believe that his flaw was that he
    did not seem to realize that debtors are like slaves, and that slavery is not compatible with freedom, nor with
    free market theory. Futures contracts are like a debt, and require enforced performance, which enslaves the
    https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=c331645950&view=pt&search=inbox&th=1278cd... 3/24/201010-005
    COMMENT
    CL-02616
    Gmail - Silver Stock Report: Metals Position Limits
    Page 2 of 7
    participants to the margin clerk.
    Greenspan Misapplied Free Market Theory October 23rd, 2009
    http:l/silverstockreport.coml2OO91greenspan-misapplied.html
    When the CFTC enforces position limits on longs, but lets "commercial" banks short unlimited and excessive
    amounts, that's not compatible with free market theory! When big banks can use government force against
    their trading counter parties, that's not compatible with free market theory!
    The fundamental philosophical problem is that a slave trading market is not a "free" market, and there should
    not be a market for slaves at all. Similarly, the market in futures contracts is not a "free" market at all, it's a
    slave market of enslavement contracts, not a market of products. There can be no such thing as a "free"
    market of slaves; it's a contradiction in terms!
    The CFTC must regulate; it cannot sit back and do nothing.
    If nothing is done, it threatens the freedom, prosperity, and way of life of all Americans.
    The CFTC has a duty to act to prevent the current fraud in progress, that must be stopped, but it must be
    done wisely, so as to not suddenly disrupt all commercial life for all Americans.
    In 1980, precious metals prices were running away to the upside, out of control, threatening the life of the
    dollar, and the entire financial system.
    There were primarily two mechanisms that helped to limit precious metals prices. The first, was letting
    interest rates rise in the bond market. The second, was futures contracts that diverted investment demand
    away from physical, and into paper.
    Please consider what will happen as the current bull market in precious metals matures, and when futures
    contracts default, and become discredited, and thus, lose their power to pull people back to paper? A
    precious metals default will likely drive people into real tangible physical metals more fervently than ever
    before in the history of paper money in the United States, suddenly destroying the value of the currency, and
    ruining the entire economy of the nation, which could lead to a collapse of most commerce, which could lead
    to death and starvation on a massive scale. That must be prevented through a smooth transition back to
    honesty in commerce.
    The coming default in the precious metals futures markets is extremely dangerous for all people living in the
    United States, as it will inevitably lead to the crashing of the US dollar, or more accurately, Federal Reserve
    Notes.
    The current state of the futures market in precious metals shows that it must end in default, which is to say, a
    failure or inability of the shorts to deliver the silver, as they have shorted too many contracts.
    A futures exchange for precious metals is inherently manipulative and fraudulent by nature.
    The public, in the real world, usually would laugh at a precious metals coin shop offering bullion for delivery
    "in a month or two", when a coin shop down the street can deliver immediately over the counter.
    At our coin shops, we only re-order bullion from bullion wholesalers who can deliver bullion with overnight
    delivery, or for delivery within a week, at the most. Thus, we sell most bullion over the counter.
    There is no legitimate reason for a futures exchange for precious metals. Agricultural commodities have a
    harvest season, and for them, it might make sense. But miners produce all year long, and so do refineries,
    thus, there is no need for them to lock in a price before any sort of harvest season.
    https ://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=c331645950&view=pt&search=inbox&th
    =
    1278cd... 3/24/201010-005
    COIMMENT
    CL-02616
    Gmail - Silver Stock Report: Metals Position Limits
    Page 3 of 7
    It is claimed that miners need to lock in future prices in order to obtain debt financing. But that's not true, for
    two reasons. First, if a miner cannot produce metal without debt financing, perhaps they probably should not
    be producing metal at all. There are other ways to finance; such as equity financing, bootstrap financing, or
    private capital deployment.
    Second, if debt is bad because it is like slavery and can lead to default, and if the CFTC is supposed to
    regulate markets to prevent default, then the CFTC should prevent the debt and leverage inherent in the
    futures markets. In other words, debt cannot be used as an excuse to legitimize debt, as that is just circular
    reasoning.
    But furthermore, excessively funding extra gold mining production is what excessive short sellers would need
    most, isn't it, so that's a poor justification for their activities.
    A precious metals futures exchange is not a legitimate market for any major producers or users, not as long
    as it is used as a last resort, and not as long as approximately 1% of contracts result in delivery. Why would I,
    as a dealer, ever buy in the futures market, when delivery dates are so uncertain and over such a long time
    frame? And our organization buys up to !0,000 oz. of silver in one order! Thus, a futures market simply
    encourages speculation, which is to say, it enables leveraged debt-based bets on which way prices will move
    between the present and some future delivery date.
    When investors feel they are able to get such leverage on price movements, it distracts them away from
    investing in the real thing, and thus, the existence of a futures market diverts investment demand away from
    real metal, thus depressing precious metals prices.
    Bart Chilton wrote that "Three of the five commissioners -- Democrat Michael Dunn and Republicans Jill
    Sommers and Scott O'Malia -- have expressed concerns the energy proposal could drive trade to markets
    outside the CFTC's jurisdiction."
    TOO LATE! According to the Bank of International Settlements, the LBMA and other "over the counter"
    precious metals markets are already over 10 times larger than the COMEX futures exchange.
    The BIS notes that"over the counter" "other precious metals" derivatives have exceeded $203 billion of
    notional value, which, at $17/oz., is 11.9 billion ounces of silver.
    See:
    http://www,
    bis.or.qlstatisticslotcderldt21
    c22a. pdf
    The total open interest in silver futures contracts is about 140,000, x 5000 oz. = 700 million.
    The problem is that the "over the counter" markets are not transparent, and thus, cannot be used by any other
    market participants to set prices, it is likely that the bulk of the other precious metals derivatives use COMEX
    pricing as the basis for the value of their derivatives.
    If the futures markets in precious metals are fraudulent by nature, how in the world can mere position limits fix
    things?
    First of all, let's note that currently, there are only position limits imposed on the longs, those who may stand
    for delivery of precious metals. There are no limits imposed on the commercial shorts.
    But that's backwards. It should never be illegal for any investor in any market to buy what they want with their
    money. There should never be any limits on longs. Thus, all longs should be exempt from all limits.
    But it's the shorts Who can manipulate markets by depressing prices by selling what they do not have, which
    creates the possibility for default, which must be regulated, and limited.
    https ://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=c331645950&view=pt&search=inbox&th=1278cd... 3/24/201010-005
    COMMENT
    CL-02616
    Gmail - Silver Stock Report: Metals Position Limits
    Page 4 of 7
    Given the huge size of the OTC positions, up to 12 billion ounces, which dwarfs the size of world annual
    production at 0.6 billion ounces, systemic default seems inevitable, and long past due.
    The OCC report goes to show that JP Morgan dominates the gold derivatives trade, and thus, likely
    dominates the silver derivatives trade as well.
    http:llwww.occ.treas.govlftplreleasel2009-161
    a. pdf
    The CFTC has continually lied to protect the excessive short selling in the market, by releasing reports that
    deny "manipulation" given the surface language,, but admit manipulation if you know how read between the
    lines.
    For example, the CFTC has stated that as shorts cover, and buy back positions, the buying back of a position
    pushes prices up, thus negating any negative price action. But that admits that the market prices are lower
    than they would be, if the shorts are not covered and remain open, which they continually are, as they are
    always rolled over into future months.
    As another example, the CFTC has stated that the market cannot be manipulated as long as there are no
    restrictions preventing participants from taking long positions, but there are position limits on the longs, which
    prove that the market is, in fact, manipulated.
    As long as the CFTC continually lies and issues hypocritical statements, they lose credibility, and make
    themselves an accomplice to the ongoing fraud. Perhaps the CFTC members today will be found to be guilty
    of obstruction of justice if a more honest administration is elected?
    In school, they teach that the futures markets create more stable prices. But it seems to me that futures
    markets create more wild price swings than there would be otherwise without futures markets.
    It was panic short covering, and panic over the dollar failing (and the dollar used to be a derivative of silver
    prices) that drove silver to $50/oz. in 1980.
    Futures markets make prices more volatile, more extreme, in my opinion. They both allow the creation of
    prices that are manipulated too high, and too low, because they allow debt-enabled leverage trades on both
    sides of the market.
    Default is ever more likely, and obviously looms.
    Default, we can see, is already being prepared for, in advance, in three ways.
    First, I see that there are cash settlement options for precious metals contracts.
    Second, futures contracts can be settled via ETF shares.
    Third, the COMEX went public, and was sold to the CME, another public company, and public companies
    have the protection of limited liability, as stock holders are simply not on the hook for any sort of debt liability
    at all, while the private owners of the exchange used to be ultimately liable, that is no longer the case.
    I see that it has been proposed to impose position limits on the commercial shorts.
    It has been proposed that no entity maintain any position larger than 5 or 10 percent of the open interest.
    That's simply silly, as the largest traders could simply set up dummy corporations to continue to short all that
    they want, and how could anyone know?
    Another alternative would be to maintain a certain fractional reserve percentage of metal on deposit, such as
    https://mail.google.com/mai1/?ui=2&ik=c331645950&view=pt&search=inbox&th=1278cd... 3/24/201010-005
    COIMMENT
    CL-02616
    Gmai! - Silver Stock Report: Metals Position Limits
    Page 5 of 7
    40% backing, to help guarantee delivery.
    That's also silly, as there could be 100% backing on the COMEX, but the OTC market clearly shows
    derivatives that are over 10 times as large, and clearly cannot all be backed by real metal, so the overall fraud
    in the world silver market would continue!
    But if the other derivatives in the OTC market are priced based on COMEX prices, because the COMEX
    market's prices are public, and thus looks to the COMEX for it's price discovery function, then it's all the more
    important that there be 100% backing for all precious metals contracts at the COMEX. Furthermore, it must
    be insured that the metal that backs all futures contracts is not encumbered by other contracts, derivatives,
    ETFs or other obligations.
    There are no solutions that are viable other than requiring a 100% backing of all short futures contract
    positions. Nothing less would insure delivery, limit liability, and prevent default.
    What we are examining here is an exchange. Longs put down money, a part of what they ultimately need to
    delivery, cash. Similarly, shorts should be obligated to deposit silver, prior to delivery. Each should make a
    deposit of 100% of the notional value of the contract.
    This should be the job of the CFTC regulators: to physically inspect bars on deposit, and to do the
    calculations necessary to insure that no futures contract is offered for sale unless there is a full 100% backing
    of metal on deposit to back the position, and that such metal cannot be used to back any other kind of short
    sale.
    That would still not end the fraud taking place in the London market and in the OTC markets, or other markets
    overseas, but it would at least be a step in the right direction, as the COMEX pricing would at least more
    accurately reflect real prices for real metal.
    All the gamblers would still have a place to go, but at least it would be an honest form of gambling, and not a
    rigged casino.
    But a sudden ending, or destruction of futures market price rigging or manipulation could also lead to the
    destruction of the dollar. The transition back to honesty and honest markets needs to be gradual so as to
    hopefully not upset everything.
    As concentration in futures has reached levels of up to 40-90%, it needs to start out being slowly capped, and
    racheted down, step by step, following along a plan, going down gradually to the more ideal level of no more
    than 5% of the open interest.
    Further, a precious metals backing needs to be implemented gradually. Currently, with about 120 million oz.
    on deposit in the warehouses, and only 50 million ounces registered for delivery, which is used to back from
    700, to 800 million ounces of futures contracts (which is about a 6% backing). If such silver is also used to
    price, and back, up to 12 billion ounces of silver in the other precious metals over the counter derivatives (that
    would show about a 0.4% backing). Thus, the deposit requirements must be increased gradually, over time,
    so as to not drive silver prices to $1000/oz. overnight, as such things can cause an economic crisis worse
    than that felt in Argentina, which is certainly counterproductive.
    It is esPecially important for the CFTC to at least be seen as doing something to prevent default. After all,
    why else should the CFTC exist? And after all, this selling of silver that the commercials don't have is clearly
    manipulative, fraudulent, and is a hidden attack on the value of everyone's money as it is allowed to continue.
    If the fraud is exposed suddenly and things go badly, the public may cry for blood, literally, as history has
    shown. It will be important for the CFTC that the CFTC is not seen as being complicit, and not be seen as if
    they are aiding in the fraud, or hiding the fraud, which is the perception today.
    http:llen, wikipedia.orglwikilComplicit
    An individual is complicit in a crime if he/she is aware of its occurrence and has the ability to report the
    https ://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=c331645950&view=pt&search=inbox&th= 1278cd... 3/24/201010-005
    CONNENT
    CL-02616
    Gmail - Silver Stock Report: Metals Position Limits
    Page 6 of 7
    crime, but fails to do so. As such the individual effectively allows criminals to carry out a crime despite easily
    being able to stop them, either directly or by contacting the authorities, thus making the individual a de-facto
    accessory.,
    to the crime rather than an innocent bystander.
    A good first step for the CFTC, or at least, for some of the honest people working at the CFTC, is to admit that
    the excessive selling of futures contracts is manipulative, and that steps should be taken to limit this market
    manipulation.
    For more, see
    http://silverstockreport.com/2010/cftc-meetin.q.html
    If you support the statements and philosophy in this document, please send your own copy, with your own
    name, to:
    Written materials should be mailed to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Center,
    1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC, 20581, attention Office of the Secretariat; transmitted by facsimile at
    202-418-5521; or transmitted electronically to
    meta shear [email protected].
    Reference should be made to "metals
    position limits."
    I strongly advise you to get real gold and silver, at anywhere near today's prices, while you still
    can.
    Price Board:
    h ttp :lljhmint comlcqi-binlssrbidask
    Our Coin Shops are open 10AM to 5PM Pacific, Monday to Friday
    100 oz. silver minimum, USA shipping, wire transfer only!
    Janelle (530) 913 0553 silver supportl~vzw.blackberH.net
    JH MINT & Coin Shop, Grass Valley, CA
    (530) 273-8175
    http://www.ihmint.com/
    Rocklin Coin Shop, CA, 15 min north of Sacramento
    http://rocklincoinshop.com/
    Or visit www.momsilvershop.com
    (Mom will ship in lots of
    more or
    less than 100 ounces of silver,
    and overseas, and take credit cards or
    pay pal.)
    Sincerely,
    Jason Hommel
    In case you miss an email, check the archives:
    http://silverstockreport.com/
    https ://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=c331645950&view=pt&search=inbox&th= 1278cd... 3/24/2010