Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Sunshine Act Sunshine Act Meeting: March 25, 2010

  • From: Henry G Jarecki
    Organization(s):
    Gresham Investment Management LLC

    Comment No: 22869
    Date: 3/31/2010

    Comment Text:

    10-005
    COMMENT
    CL-02570
    INVESTMENT
    MANAGEMENT
    March 31, 2010
    LLC
    Dr. Henry
    G.
    Jarecki
    Chairman
    Mr. Gary Gensler
    Chairman
    Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    Three Lafayette Centre
    1155 21st Street, NW
    Washington, DC 20581
    e-Mail: [email protected]
    Dear Chairman Oensler:
    ThaN( you so much for letting me participate in the March
    25
    th
    meeting. As you can tell, I find such
    discussions, and particularly the impromptu part, stimulating and challenging.
    Just to clarify one matter: I do not object at all to regulation¯ I am as critical of much that happened in
    the last two years as I thiN( you and the American public are, and I thiN( Government has great
    *
    ¯
    ¯
    S
    opportunities to prevent it hereafter. I was commenting on the ~dea that all that was needed wa to set
    limits and that it wouldn't matter how high they were or even if they had any impact. That is what led to
    my comment about regulation for regulation's sake and to the overstated metaphor that it could lead to
    regulating when each trader should.go for lunch. :
    The limits that you are exploring do not, so it seems to me, have the same "for its own sake" impact. I
    may not agree with you (and as you know I don't in some particulars) but I thiN( that what you are
    suggesting certainly will prevent the very big boys from having very large positions.
    I also thiN( it is important for the Commission to be able to make distinctions between actions that
    could conceivably be harmfN to an orderly market and those that could not. To that end, we would
    suggest that for those portions of a trading firm's business that meet certain qualifications, such firms be
    considered intermediaries and position limitations be placed on the final beneficiary.: The criteria that
    would define such business, and allow for positions to be disaggregated and counted at the end user are:
    the inte~rnediary must announce openly what mix of commodities a person will be
    buying when he invests, so that it is the. customer, not the intermediary, who is maldng
    the decision;
    the customer must give the intermediary 100% margin which is segregated at the
    intermediary's baN( and/or clearing member, so that there is no risk of excessive
    speculation;
    * My old friend and former regulator, Jim Stone, just wrote a piece in the Boston Globe about financial industry
    regulation. I share his views, especially about the central character of price opacity and excessive leverage.
    67 Irving Place
    New York, N.Y. 10003
    Telephone (212) 984-1440
    Fax: (212) 984-144210-005
    COMMENT
    CL-02570
    GRESHAM
    INVESTMENT
    MANAGEMENT LLC
    Mr. Gary Gensler, Chairman
    Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    March 31, 2010
    Page 2
    Co
    all contracts must be exchange-traded and clearing-house cleared, so that there is
    transparency and safety;
    the intermediary must make available to the CFTC the name and quantum of each market
    participant whose positions in total exceed a certain amount;
    the set of positions must be truly diversified, so that there is no concentration in any
    commodity (we have as you know 31 commodities in our pool)
    intermediaries granted this right must not make use of over-the-counter trades as
    coverage for their positions; and
    the intermediaries must ensure that their clients be out of all spot positions an agreed
    length of time before the first delivery day.
    I would be happy to visit with you to discuss the possibility of malting a distinction for the portion of
    business of those enterprises which act solely in this fashion, as this should completely obviate the risks
    of opaqueness, concentration, and excessive leverage. I can understand not wanting to make exceptions
    or gr~int exemptions, biat it should equitlly be unsatisfactoryto tba'ottle abu-sin-e~ that h~g caused no
    harm and has no prospect of doing so. It is the business of the Commission to make distinctions and I
    was grateful to hear you say you shared that view and were not thinldng of just having a blanket
    approach.
    All the foregoing notwithstanding, I enjoyed the challenge of the meeting and of seeing you once again
    in command of it all.
    All best wishes.
    Sincerely yours,
    H:\Typing\LTR\Gensler Gary-032510.wpd
    033 ll0/ernr(v)