Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Sunshine Act Sunshine Act Meeting: March 25, 2010

  • From: Eric Nansen
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 22685
    Date: 4/7/2010

    Comment Text:

    10-005
    COMMENT
    CL-02386
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    secretary

    Wednesday, April 7, 2010 11:14 AM
    Metals
    Hearing
    FW: Comments on the Metals position limits public hearing
    ..... Original Message .....
    From: Eric Nansen [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 10:35 AM
    To: secretary
    Subject: Comments on the Metals position limits public hearing
    Dear Sir;
    I trade futures except for silver because of the illogical wild swings in price. I watched (and rewatched) the entire March 25,
    2010 hearing on metal position limits. The conclusion I came to was that position limits and hedging without exemptions to
    bullion banks that have paper backing paper must me imposed and enforced. The arguments that the participants will go to
    other markets are not relevant to this decision. They won't go if the market is fair and transparent. I believe that the proposal
    to establish a speculative position limit in COMEX silver of no more than 1500 contracts is appropriate. Also a restriction
    must be placed with an exemption from those limits to legitimate hedgers (end users not bullion banks). The obvious
    concentration by four or less participants in COMEX silver futures that have been experienced over the past few years on the
    short side of the market must be stopped. Limits must be equally applied to the long and
    short side of the silver market.
    Best Regards,
    Eric Nansen