Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Diana G
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 2263
    Date: 1/21/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-02263
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    DIANA G
    Thursday, January 21, 2010 8:59 PM
    secreta ry < secreta ry@ C FTC. g ov >
    RIN 3038-AC61 OPPOSITION
    Dear Mr/Mrs Secretary
    I strongly oppose the reduction of trading leverage from 100:1 to 10:1. I find it extreme and
    believe it will force money out of the country and in turn depleat the US markets. As a currency
    trader I will do everything possible to continue trading at 100:1 even if it means moving funds
    offshore or even relocating to Europe where I am originally from. Maybe 50:1 to match the Futures
    market would be more feasible but 10:1 I think is absolutely ridiculous and do not see the logic in.
    I do not think it will lower risk but it will push investments offshore and limit the ability of local
    money to appropriately and competitively invest. I think the lesson in leverage has been learned
    and 100:1 is very reasonable, as the inability to invest will not be prevented by reducing leverage
    to such extremes, it might handicap the entire field.
    I hope that common sense prevails and our current leverage parameters are maintained at 100:1.
    Please accept this letter as my vehement opposition to RIN 3038-AC61.
    I
    look forward to you
    supporting this position.
    Sincerely,
    Diana G