Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Sunshine Act Sunshine Act Meeting: March 25, 2010

  • From: J Yee
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 22372
    Date: 4/8/2010

    Comment Text:

    10-005
    COMMENT
    CL-02073
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    secretary
    Thursday, April 8, 2010 7:54 AM
    Metals Hearing
    FW: Position Limits on Futures and Options Trading in the Metals Markets
    From:
    Jason Yee [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent:
    Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:34 AM
    To:
    Metals Hearing
    Cc: secretary; Jason Yee
    Subject: Position Limits on Futures and Options Trading in the Metals Markets
    Dear Sir,
    Many thanks for allowing public opinion on this topic and publicizing the hearing of March 25, 2010.
    I fully support adoption of position limits on all metal futures trading on the COMEX which includes
    the trading of gold, silver, etc. so as to ensure proper and orderly efficient function of the markets
    and pricing. I also support extension of these same limits for all players including
    hedgers/custodians regardless and can not understand why exemptions would even be considered
    since the intent is to price discovery without any manipulative distortions by any player.
    While there may be debate about how and what these position limits should be, as a rule the CFTC
    can adopt a 5% limit of total open contracts as a precursory maximum on both gross long contracts
    and gross short contracts. All concentrated holdings in excess of the 5% gross contract limit rule
    will warrant prompt investigation and/or liquidation per market practice. While debate will rage on
    whether this limit should apply to net position instead, the intent of the 5% gross rule is to ensure no
    manipulative concentrated position on both long and short sides to mitigate any market disturbance
    and so-called black swan low probability events. No exception should be granted to any hedgers -
    albeit true producers with metal productions expected in the future or those who are profiting from
    arbitrage/trading. Again, the intent is to place a cap to circumvent any excessive concentrated
    positions that may lead to high risky events eg., COMEX shutdown and unethical manipulative
    practices that can arise from some of the more dominant players with larger exposure and
    conflicting interest.
    I understand that some major players hold excessive concentrated short positions in COMEX gold
    and silver now and in the past that deserves immediate attention. I also understand that no recourse
    has been made by the regulators for these companies to liquidate and reduce excessive
    concentrations down to a safer non-manipulative size especially after the takeover of Bear Stearns.
    I
    also read about some London whistleblower with concrete proof of silver metal price manipulation in
    the past [and ahead in the future] but no action had been taken to investigate.
    I am hopeful that the CFTC will do the right thing by instigating non-manipulative position limits (of
    about 5% on total open contracts) given their role as entrusted regulator or cop while bringing back
    the public and international community's confidence with the US officials and markets. Damage to
    the USA must be restored by the US officials in charge promptly without any long drawn process
    (eg., Madoff, silver manipulation) to provoke no further mistrust with the government officials, US
    companies and American people.
    Regards,
    J. Yee, CPA, FRM, CFE