Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Sunshine Act Sunshine Act Meeting: March 25, 2010

  • From: Kenneth Marquardt
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 21719
    Date: 4/9/2010

    Comment Text:

    10-005
    COMMENT
    CL-01420
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    [email protected]
    Friday, April 9, 2010 5:43 PM
    Metals Hearing
    Silver futures
    Secretary of the Commission
    Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    Three Lafayette Centre
    1155 21st Street NW
    Washington, DC 20581
    Dear Sir;
    I have watched with great interest the proceedings and public hearing related to the potential manipulation in the precious
    metals markets. I have been involved with the silver market specifically for over 20 years and have determined from my own
    observations a number of years ago that something was definitely amiss.
    Some of us speculated as to who it was that might be messing with these markets and a number of company names came up
    but it was impossible to tell who it might be and of course the names of the largest traders are not released by the CFTC. That
    said, it became quite apparent last year after the takeover of Bear Stearns by JP Morgan Chase just who the culprit was
    because all of a sudden a large number of contracts was removed from one section of the commitment of traders report and
    suddenly appeared under the bank section.
    A number of us have also speculated that somehow this huge short sale of silver was tied somehow into derivitives and a
    good friend I have at JP Morgan in NYC confirmed to me last fall that indeed the bank was involved with this and that meetings
    were underway related to it.
    At any rate, I want to thank you for looking into this and for the opportunity for public comment on it. I would ask you to strongly
    consider stopping the huge concentration in COMEX Silver futures and implement position limits of no more than 1500
    contracts for any company, including spinoff corporations under the same umbrella. Also it would be a good idea to restrict
    any hedging exemptions from those limits to legitimate hedgers.
    One thing that astounds me is that with all the Ponzi schemes as well as bank defaults and bailouts that have occurred over
    the past year why would a bank be doing this type of thing? Why would it be allowed and what business do they have in this
    type of speculation? They should be getting their houses in order as the last thing we need is another financial mess for the
    taxpayers to clean up.
    Sincerely,
    Kenneth Marquardt