Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Sunshine Act Sunshine Act Meeting: March 25, 2010

  • From: Kenneth D McCoy
    Organization(s):
    Northen Tier Inc

    Comment No: 21682
    Date: 4/9/2010

    Comment Text:

    10-005
    COMMENT
    CL-01383
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Ken McCoy
    Friday, April 9, 2010 9:56 PM
    Metals Hearing
    Ted Butler Commentary - A Time to Act
    Dear Sirs;
    I have been watching the case going on with the CFTC regarding position limits and have written
    Chairman Gensler and some of the others Ted Butler recommended a while back. One of the points
    made in the letter was that position limits appear to be rather irrelevant when there is no verifiable
    supply behind the futures contract and therefore position limits appear to be a stop gap measure to
    preclude the runaway short situation we have today.
    The argument that position limits will drive business to other markets doesn't hold water. If there is a
    supply of a commodity a contract may be written against it - no supply: no contract. The supply should
    be verifiable - gold on the moon or an orbiting asteroid should not qualify. Likewise with soybeans, as
    there appear to be more contracts chasing soybeans and other food commodities than is currently
    available - this could potentially cause famine in some countries that are counting on delivery of those
    commodities.
    So perhaps the limit should be on the number of contracts written against any given commodity shall be
    based on a proven and available supply. Commodity contracts written in the US should be done on
    commodities verified available in the US - maybe that would inspire an audit of Ft Knox - then whatever
    happens in any other market around the globe may happen; if some governments wish to write contracts
    on fictional commodities their markets will not long exist, nor will ours if this situation is not repaired.
    This basically boils down to an accounting issue and the banks in London have too long played games
    with the measure of gold available in the system. If a limited number of contracts are available for a
    given commodity it will obviously be more likely that the price will rise for those contracts when they
    are one to one parity with supply. This would alert farmers, for example, to plant more soy beans to
    meet a projected shortfall.
    Everything that I have read to date suggests that all of the commodities contracts have no correlation to
    physical supply, and if this is the case, how will the "free market" system in the United States ever be
    expected to work. We otherwise regress into a postwar state of communist quotas and doublespeak to
    explain shortages and people waiting in lines for hours to purchase a loaf of bread. Fix it gentlemen,
    and fix it right.
    Kenneth D. McCoy
    Northen Tier, Inc
    9701 Benson Rd
    kynden, WA 98264
    360-379-4837