Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Sunshine Act Sunshine Act Meeting: March 25, 2010

  • From: Jon Nimtz
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 21063
    Date: 4/12/2010

    Comment Text:

    10-005
    COMMENT
    CL-00764
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Jon Nimtz
    Monday, April 12, 2010 2:08 PM
    Metals Hearing
    My brief comments on the hearing
    Dear Sir;
    I watched the entire CFTC hearing on the metals with great interest and developed even more
    cause for concern than I already had on this topic, which was already quite substantial. Iwishto
    thank you for providing the investing public with the chance to watch the hearings, and to make
    their comment on the issue of position limits for precious metals.
    It certainly appears there are many legitimate areas for concern and additional aggressive
    oversight and enforcement action by the CFTC, and I found the testimony regarding a
    whistleblower in the silver market to be stunning in the level of detail and honesty about what JP
    Morgan Chase is doing to the investing public, and how they are fleecing the public for millions of
    dollars. I have wondered why it took this long for someone in the business to come forward and
    testify to something that my circle of dozens of investing friends has seen occurring for years. This
    potential fraud is on a scale so massive, it dwarfs the Bernie Madoff Ponzi Scheme, and the CFTC
    needs to vigorously address these concentration and manipulation issues before a failure to deliver
    sets off a massive worldwide eruption in the price of precious metals that appear to be manipulated
    in every sense of the word.
    The price of precious metals should be allowed to be freely discovered in the open market by
    thousands of buyers and sellers, not 1-2 concentrated short sellers, who are allegedly hedging their
    shorts with paper longs in another market, that testimony by Mr. Christian and Mr. Douglas made
    quite clear is a paper Ponzi Scheme trading paper metal at 100 times the underlying physical metal
    being held. This isa recipe for disaster on the COMEX.
    Iwould like to see two things done. Please establish a speculative position limit in COMEX silver of
    no more than 1500 contracts. Please restrict any hedging exemptions from those limits to
    legitimate hedgers. Please stop the levels of concentration in COMEX silver futures that have been
    experienced over the past few years on the short side of the market.
    Secondly, any short seller of precious metals should be required to put up large, verified physical
    deposits of the precious metal to assure they can deliver. Cash settlement is nota legitimate way
    to close outa contract in a physical delivery market. I would suggest 50% of a short position
    would be an appropriate level.
    Thank you so very much for your openness and willingness to provide free trading markets and
    eliminate concentration and manipulation.
    Sincerely,
    Jon
    Nimtz
    7468 E. Raintree Ct.
    Scottsdale, AZ, 85258
    CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:10-005
    COMMENT
    CL-00764
    This e-mail contains confidential information and is intended only for the
    individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you should not
    disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
    immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this
    e-mail from your system. E-mail cannot be guaranteed to be secure or
    error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
    destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Neither the
    sender nor CoBiz Financial and its subsidiaries accept liability for any
    errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a
    result of e-mail transmission.