Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Sunshine Act Sunshine Act Meeting: March 25, 2010

  • From: L N Peterson
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 20630
    Date: 4/23/2010

    Comment Text:

    10-005
    COMMENT
    CL-00331
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Pete
    Friday, April 23, 2010 3:49 PM
    Metals Hearing
    Comment on establishing firm limits on PM futures trading.
    I hope this email address reaches your comment section. I found no
    reference to Precious Metal Limits on your home page. I prefer going on
    record in a more formal setting.
    Thank you for providing a forum for comment on the consideration of
    establishing firm position limits on PM trading. As a small investor in
    mining companies and the raw metals, I have been discouraged by lack of
    consistency between what should be rock hard fundamental drivers and the
    actual prices seen for gold and silver on your exchange. I believe the
    prices are highly impacted by the fact that there exists large
    speculators bidding as commercial traders. This concentration of
    positions offers the potential for manipulation and leaves a small long
    investor at the mercy of powerful interests that have no interest in
    supply and demand price setting. I do not think it is in the best
    interest of our markets to sacrifice a sense of honesty for the extra
    liquidity the current system is said to support.
    Please establish position limits for gold and silver that reflect real
    world quantities of these metals being bought and sold for beneficial
    purpose. Also, I consider it necessary for you to abolish exceptions
    for the purpose of hedging against derivatives. Most of all, please
    ensure that transparency is provided so as to eliminate speculation that
    prices are being manipulated by concentrated trading by unknown entities.
    Thank you for the Hearing and an opportunity to comment.
    L.N. Peterson
    Spokane, WA