Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Sunshine Act Sunshine Act Meeting: March 25, 2010

  • From: Phil I Chang
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 20589
    Date: 4/24/2010

    Comment Text:

    10-005
    COMMENT
    CL-00290
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Phil Inj e Chang
    Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:05 AM
    Metals Hearing
    Commentary
    Dear CFTC,
    Thank you for the public commentary period on position limits and concentration of trading positions in
    gold and silver.
    In futures markets the original intention of allowing businesses to hedge has become cloudy beyond
    recognition in gold and especially in silver. A simple speculative position limit would be a start and then
    strictly identifying hedgers and restricting any exemption from the position limit to legitimate hedgers
    only is an obvious solution.
    Enforcing that will of course require a process of confirming business identities and intentions, and then
    monitoring violations with harsh consequences for repeated violations. This undoubtedly will expand
    the work you do, and there is always the possibility of circumvention through devious means, but a
    harsh penalty will go a long way toward reducing the illegitimate activity currently in plain sight.
    Among speculative traders, the COMEX name has been tainted by the questionable activity of a small
    number of banks. Establishing clear rules as discussed above will go a long way toward separating the
    COMEX name from the manipulative activities of a few participants.
    Thank you.
    Best regards,
    Phil Chang
    Phil Inj e Chang
    +81 (0)80 3592 0961 (Japan)
    philinj [email protected] p (mobile)
    philinj [email protected] (personal)
    Skype: philinj e