Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Benjamin Segal
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 2035
    Date: 1/21/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-02035
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Benjamin Segal
    Thursday, January 21, 2010 5:43 PM
    secretary

    Regulation of Retail Forex
    To whom it may concern:
    I am a college student majoring in math and economics, and a retail
    foreign exchange trader. I focus on a time horizon of about 6 months,
    and make trading decisions based on fundamental economic analysis. I
    have always believed and argued to others that 100:1 leverage is far too
    high in essentially all circumstances. I do not oppose a decrease in the
    maximum leverage ratio for retail foreign exchange to around 50:1, but I
    believe the current proposal to limit leverage to 10:1 excessive, and
    would have a number of negative consequences, even for traders like me
    who would never want to use even 50:1 leverage, let alone 100:1.
    Currently my foreign exchange leverage is only about 12.5:1, and that is
    about where I want it to be. However, since I make my trading decisions
    based the analysis of economic fundamentals, it sometimes happens that
    in the short run, the market moves against my positions even as my
    analysis stays the same or becomes still more convincing. At such times
    I tend to allow my use of leverage to increase, because I believe that
    short term market volatility is often only noise which will be of little
    consequence over my time horizon.
    However, while on average a maximum leverage ratio of 10:1 would force
    me to decrease my position sizes only slightly, at times of increased
    volatility such a maximum would likely cause unnecessary margin calls
    that would force me to exit my positions just when I believe the market
    is behaving least rationally. Fear of such a contingency would thus
    cause me to reduce my leverage far below even the 10:1 limit, allowing
    me to take on less than the optimal amount of risk given my risk
    preferences.
    More generally, it is important to recognize that any decrease in the
    maximum leverage ratio is likely to have a similar effect for many
    medium and long term traders, and thus the effective maximum leverage
    ratio for many foreign exchange traders will be significantly lower than
    the actual rule. Even considering this, I think a maximum leverage ratio
    not less than 50:1 would not be unreasonable, and would have the added
    benefit of protecting, somewhat, those uninformed traders who do
    regularly use close to 100:1 margin, but a maximum much lower than that
    would have too many negative side-effects for traders like me.
    Sincerely,
    Benjamin Segal