Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Stephen Munday
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 1935
    Date: 1/21/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-01935
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Stephen Munday
    Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:28 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Dear Sir
    During the last year there has been increasing amount of regulation of retail forex which on the face of it
    has been for the benefit of clients. However, as a member of a number of online communities involved
    in Forex Trading, I cannot recall one time that a fellow trader has welcomed the news of further
    regulation. What is also disturbing is that although there always are "listening" periods, the regulations
    that are then brought in are no different from the proposals, which can only make me conclude that there
    is no real interest in listening to the consumer on this one.
    Now we come to the latest proposal of reducing leverage from 100:1 to 10:1. This is completely
    unacceptable and will drive myself and a lot of other traders to look for other solutions in other
    iurisdictions. The trader is in no way protected by this reduction in leverage, as he will just increase the
    size of the positions he takes in order to achieve the results he wants, and then he will actually expose
    himself to margin call earlier. This proposal does nothing to protect the consumer and in fact it does just
    the opposite, while at the same time driving this rapidly growing industry and provider of US jobs
    offshore to Europe, Russia and elsewhere.
    I hope very much the the views of the trading public will actually be listened to on this occasion.
    Thank you for your time.
    Yours,
    Stephen Munday