Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Kim Chauvin
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 1910
    Date: 1/21/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-01910
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Kim Chauvin
    Thursday, January 21, 2010
    2:48 PM
    secretary

    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Please do not lower Forex leverage from 100:1 to 10:1.
    On January 13, 2010, the CFTC announced proposed new regulations concerning retail foreign currency transactions. Many
    of the proposed changes would implement important consumer protection regulations, which I am fully in favor of; however,
    one of the proposed changes would radically lower Forex leverage from 100:1 to 10:1 for all NFA and CFTC regulated Forex
    firms.
    The impact of this new leverage requirement for me, an individual FOREX trader would be negatively significan!! I (as have
    many of my trading friends) have spent much time and money (software, training classes, electronic feeds) in learning to
    trade the Forex market in an attempt to supplement my income (with the intention of Forex trading becoming my main source
    of income, if I so chose). Many of my friends are using Forex to supplement their retirement income. With the downtown in
    the economy and lack of jobs/work, trading the Forex is a viable alternative for me to make a living.., but not if you take
    away the 100:1 leverage.
    I recognize the importance of regulation that strengthens industry oversight and agree with policing and regulating the
    industry, as was Congress' intent when empowering the CFTC to create additional rules. However, I don't agree with policies
    that might clearly disadvantage firms in the United States which in turn will disadvantage ME, the individual retail trader. In
    your call to protect/serve, please be careful not to throw out the baby with the bath water.
    I would hate to think that I would need to turn to firms outside of the United States to conduct my trading business, which
    could ultimately be a lose-lose situation as it takes my money outside of the United States and makes it more risky for me to
    do business, as those firms would likely not be subject to any regulation or oversight whatsoever, and I would be totally at
    risk.
    Respectfully,
    K. Chauvin in Louisiana